Oversight Board/Minutes
Please add to the agenda below and please join in with your ideas.
Hint: You can use an online time calculator to convert from UTC to your local time zone or back.
The Sugar Labs Meetings calendar is available in a variety of formats at these links: 
.
About
The Sugar Labs Oversight Board "shall meet at least once per quarter to discuss various topics pertaining to the regular activities of the Sugar Labs Project and Sugar. (It is expected that more frequent meeting will be required in the early stages of the program.) The minutes to these meetings shall be posted publicly on the Sugar Labs wiki,"
Committee reports will be a regular part of the meetings.
Who
The meeting is mainly targeted to Sugar Oversight Board, but everyone interested is welcome to join. It's primary purpose is to discuss general issues related to Sugar and the Sugar community; however, it is not intended as a replacement for the weekly developer meetings.
How to add topics
The discussion topics for upcoming meetings are listed below. Please contact an oversight-board member if you have additional topics you would like to add. Topics will be collected between meetings, triaged by the meeting chair, and send out in the meeting announcement on ~24 hours before the meeting. A reminder to add topics will be announced in the Sugar Digest. Please consider including the following data when making a request:
- a link to existing discussion thread(s) on public mailing list;
- a brief summary of each option or alternative being proposed; and
- a rationale for why this issue needs to escalate to the oversight board.
Meetings
Next meeting
Friday, 5 March 2010 - 16:00 UTC (11:00 EST)
Agenda items
- Report re our trademark policy (scenarios) [cjb and seandaley]
- Discussion of Not fully bundled .xo ASLO question
request could be shorten to- making a statement that current ASLO workflow is pretty unreliable, since ASLO is deployment agnostic, trying to bundle binaries to .xo is pretty fragile practice. At the same time taking one particular decision would either affect basic sugar workflows (fully bundled .xo) or leave situation fragile
- thus it (could)requires non tech agreement to follow either "activities should not rely on non-SP dependencies and we should make it clear that we are not going to deploy Java/Qt/etc activities from ASLO" or "we will deploy Java/Qt/etc activities from ASLO and lets take the right tech decision(out of SLOBs) but (maybe) accept moratorium like [1] to not make situation worse until we take right tech decision" ways
- Poll results
- Review of Google Summer of Code planning
- Review of our Goals for 2010 (goals)
Please contact an oversight-board member to add topics to be considered for the meeting.
Open discussion topics
|
Administrative
|
|
Past meetings
Meetings were held on Friday and at 15:00 UTC except where specified.
|
2010 |
2009 06 Mar (minutes)
|
2008 |