Difference between revisions of "Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
* inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
 
* inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
 
* non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change
 
* non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change
* ..
+
* lack of educational value
 +
* ...

Revision as of 19:55, 29 November 2009

Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all).

Content

  • inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
  • non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change
  • lack of educational value
  • ...