Difference between revisions of "Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
* lack of educational value
 
* lack of educational value
* any confusing with already existed activities
+
* any confusion with already existed activities
 
* ...
 
* ...

Revision as of 20:02, 29 November 2009

Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all).

Reasons for removing

  • inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
  • non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for

other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change

  • ...

Reasons for retain in sandbox

  • lack of educational value
  • any confusion with already existed activities
  • ...