Difference between revisions of "Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical"

Revision as of 14:55, 4 March 2010

Some points that should be considered during activity review, some activities could be removed at all.

inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive) content
inappropriate licence, see [Oversight Board [Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-11#Non-FOSS_content|meeting notes]] for details

any confusion with already existed activities
A: make difference more clear, obvious renaming, making notice in description etc.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all).
+Some points that should be considered during activity review, some activities could be removed at all.
 === Reasons for removing ===
-* inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
+* inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive) content
-* inappropriate licence
+* inappropriate licence, see [Oversight Board [Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-11#Non-FOSS_content|meeting notes]] for details
-** code should be covered by licence from [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses FSF GPL compatible list]
-** (?) the rest of content should be covered by one of [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ CC] licences
-* (?) activity is just bundled application which already (well)packaged in various distros
-* ...
 === Reasons for retain in sandbox ===
-* (?) lack of educational value<br>arguable, it could be something useful for user environment e.g. UsbCreator<br>'''A''': add such value :)
 * any confusion with already existed activities<br>'''A''': make difference more clear, obvious renaming, making notice in description etc.
-* ...