Difference between revisions of "Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(categorize)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<noinclude>[[Category:Policy]]</noinclude>
 
=== Who can be an editor ? ===
 
=== Who can be an editor ? ===
 
Any sugar learner should and can be an editor of the Activity Library,  
 
Any sugar learner should and can be an editor of the Activity Library,  
we only advice that the editor can't be the same developer of the activity, this is truth for not-trusted activities. (see definitions bellow)  
+
we only advise that the editor can't be the developer of the activity, this is true for non-trusted activities. (see definitions bellow)  
  
* Trusted Activities  
+
* ''Trusted Activities''
 
These are activities that don't need an editor approval for publicize new updated versions.  
 
These are activities that don't need an editor approval for publicize new updated versions.  
  
* Not-trusted Activities  
+
* ''Not-trusted Activities''
 
These are activities that need an editor approval in order to publicize new updated versions of the activities
 
These are activities that need an editor approval in order to publicize new updated versions of the activities
  
Maintained activities are entitled to be trusted, and all activities that fulfill technical and non-tecnical policies can be trusted.
+
Maintained activities are entitled to be trusted, and all activities that fulfill technical and non-technical policies can be trusted.
 
 
== Removing, reviewing, removing activities ==
 
 
 
Some points that should be considered during activity review, some activities could be removed at all.
 
  
 +
== Removing, reviewing, sandboxing activities ==
  
 +
Some points that should be considered during activity review, some activities might be entirely removed.
  
 
=== Reasons for removing ===
 
=== Reasons for removing ===
  
* inappropriate (violent, sexual, subversive) content
+
* Inappropriate (violent, sexual, subversive) content
* inappropriate license, see Oversight Board [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-11#Non-FOSS_content|meeting notes]] for details
+
* Inappropriate license, see Oversight Board [[Oversight_Board/2009/Meeting_Log-2009-12-11#non-FOSS content|meeting notes]] for details.
  
 
=== Reasons for keeping or moving to the Sandbox ===
 
=== Reasons for keeping or moving to the Sandbox ===
  
Activities that are experimental are keeped in Activity's Library sandbox (i.e only registered users can download them)
+
Activities that are experimental are kept in Activity's Library sandbox (i.e., only registered users can download them).
  
: Please define retaining in this context. Is it locked from distribution, but kept on server? --[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 20:07, 17 February 2011 (EST)
 
 
* '''Any confusion with already-published activities'''<br>
 
* '''Any confusion with already-published activities'''<br>
  
'''A''': Make difference more clear, obvious renaming, making notice in description, not launching activity, etc.  
+
'''Action''': Make the difference more clear, by obvious renaming, providing notice in the description, or not launching activity, etc.  
  
 
* '''Buggy activities'''<br>
 
* '''Buggy activities'''<br>
If the activity is proving to not start or is having serious functionality problems, it should be retained and/or moved to the sandbox.
+
If the activity is proving to not start or is having serious functionality problems, it should be moved to the sandbox or removed.
  
'''A''': Contact the maintainer Developer to notify the issue.
+
'''Action''': Contact the maintainer or Developer to notify them of the issue.
  
 
** At the same time we should stimulate experiments, changing existing activities and, very importantly, sharing results of these experiments. A new ASLO code base might support having several implementations ("forks" might be too hard a word for them) of the same activity. Need to think how this can be achieved.<br>[[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 07:32, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
 
** At the same time we should stimulate experiments, changing existing activities and, very importantly, sharing results of these experiments. A new ASLO code base might support having several implementations ("forks" might be too hard a word for them) of the same activity. Need to think how this can be achieved.<br>[[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 07:32, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
  
 
* '''Obvious misuse of categories, e.g., FireFox activity in Teaching tools'''<br>
 
* '''Obvious misuse of categories, e.g., FireFox activity in Teaching tools'''<br>
'''A''': Contact the uploader to clarify the category choice.
+
'''Action''': Contact the uploader to clarify the category choice.

Latest revision as of 11:12, 1 November 2011

Who can be an editor ?

Any sugar learner should and can be an editor of the Activity Library, we only advise that the editor can't be the developer of the activity, this is true for non-trusted activities. (see definitions bellow)

  • Trusted Activities

These are activities that don't need an editor approval for publicize new updated versions.

  • Not-trusted Activities

These are activities that need an editor approval in order to publicize new updated versions of the activities

Maintained activities are entitled to be trusted, and all activities that fulfill technical and non-technical policies can be trusted.

Removing, reviewing, sandboxing activities

Some points that should be considered during activity review, some activities might be entirely removed.

Reasons for removing

  • Inappropriate (violent, sexual, subversive) content
  • Inappropriate license, see Oversight Board meeting notes for details.

Reasons for keeping or moving to the Sandbox

Activities that are experimental are kept in Activity's Library sandbox (i.e., only registered users can download them).

  • Any confusion with already-published activities

Action: Make the difference more clear, by obvious renaming, providing notice in the description, or not launching activity, etc.

  • Buggy activities

If the activity is proving to not start or is having serious functionality problems, it should be moved to the sandbox or removed.

Action: Contact the maintainer or Developer to notify them of the issue.

    • At the same time we should stimulate experiments, changing existing activities and, very importantly, sharing results of these experiments. A new ASLO code base might support having several implementations ("forks" might be too hard a word for them) of the same activity. Need to think how this can be achieved.
      alsroot 07:32, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
  • Obvious misuse of categories, e.g., FireFox activity in Teaching tools

Action: Contact the uploader to clarify the category choice.