Activity Team/Obsolete/Zero Sugar Use Cases
< Activity Team | Obsolete
Revision as of 01:28, 30 June 2010 by Alsroot (talk | contribs) (→What activity instance to prefer, natively packaged or directly from developer?)
How Zero Sugar could be useful on examples.
Natively packaged or directly from developer activities?
Zero Sugar could help with optimizing developer-to-distributor-to-user model. For example:
- developer lets 0sugar create packages for major GNU/Linux distribution on OBS
- distributors, either using native OBS features (like links and branches) create their own compilations of activities on OBS or just attach/copy OBS packages, compose repositories with activities for end users
- on end users side, sugar will understand that there are packaged and direct activity instances
- user(or distributor), by setting policy, can prefer only packaged versions
- user all time can pick up recent version from developer