Difference between revisions of "Marketing Team/Events/Sugarcamp Boston 2008/Feedback"
m (Sugarcamp/Feedback moved to MarketingTeam/Events/Sugarcamp Boston 2008/Feedback: Robot: moved page)
m (MarketingTeam/Events/Sugarcamp Boston 2008/Feedback moved to Marketing Team/Events/Sugarcamp Boston 2008/Feedback: deCamel casing)
Revision as of 17:03, 17 March 2009
Please add your thoughts inline on this page, and discuss on the Talk:Sugarcamp/Feedback page if you need to reach consensus on how to phrase a certain point. Thanks! Mchua 06:44, 23 November 2008 (UTC) (Original reflections are a collaboration by Bernie Innocenti, Walter Bender, Tomeu Vizoso, Marco Pesenti Gritti, Ben Schwartz, David Farning, Chris Ball, and Mel Chua.)
- It happened!
- Lots of people came.
- We met some extraordinary people.
- We have some new partners now.
- We had really nice meeting rooms.
- The TurtleArt portfolio demo was cool!
- The Infrastructure team got "unstuck."
- Bringing people together created a lot of energy.
- We actually can do this [run Sugarcamp]!
- What we have now [in Sugar as a product] is better than what we admit.
- We met existing volunteers.
- We met new volunteers.
- We got to hear very different points of view.
- This week was inspiring!
- We had fun people like Bernie and Yama.
- We stepped forward on technical problems.
- We met [Sugar] deployers like Caroline and Brendan.
- We increased clarity about OLPC funding.
- We got to spend time with colleagues.
- We have a better definition of OLPC vs Sugar Labs responsibilities.
- We got to resolve some issues in person [that we weren't able to resolve online].
- We got a better picture of our social interactions.
- Some people developed a lot as leaders this week, like Bernie stepping up to run Sugarcamp.
- We got to see our own dysfunctional habits.
- Ryan's speech about Sugar Labs solving a very hard problem that is "the future of computing" was inspiring.
- Gregdek standing up and trying to get us all to work together was awesome.
- The OLPC/Sugar Labs umbilical cord was cut.
- 15 hour days, 6 days in a row... cause people to break down
- We need better organizers than me next time. (said by Bernie)
- One week passes by very quickly!
- Our sessions were conducted in a hybrid format between roundtables and conferences.
- Our schedule was very dynamic.
- There was a mix between OLPC and Sugar Labs discussions.
- Walter was coding instead of listening during some sessions! (kidding)
- This is actually the second Sugarcamp - the first was in Italy about 6 months ago.
- We did not do much hacking.
- Everyone was optimizing their own time during the conference; sometimes this meant not listening to the speaker [and working on their laptop or having side conversations instead].
- "Useful for kids" is our equivalent of "Because I Said So." We say it when we don't want people to argue with us any more.
- We focus when we make something together, like when we took notes together on the whiteboard.
- Dfarning was a good cop.
- If we fix the problem of long-distance collaborators participating in Sugarcamp, we'll also fix the problem of quiet people not talking.
- Too many unfocused interruptions.
- The schedule slipped due to untimed talks.
- People escaped points of disagreements.
- The pizza was unreliable.
- Action items didn't come out of technical BS (brainstorms).
- The OLPC roadmap session was frustrating because it didn't leverage the Sugar Labs community.
- Few people were able to contribute.
- The schedule changed a lot.
- At the beginning of the week, there were some difficulties between people.
- There was disrespect between some people.
- Infinite arguments.
- Some people still think there are "sides."
- Premature optimization.
- "Smartest kid in the room" syndrome (a.k.a. Apollo Syndrome)
- Quiet people didn't talk because we didn't ask them what they thought.
- Long distance collaborators had a hard time on the phone.
- Seconded. As a remote participant, I found it was hard to get attention during sometimes heated conversation. It was hard to stay focussed. It was hard to know what was happening and when (schedule changes etc). --Morgs 14:43, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- The relationship between OLPC and Sugar Labs remains unresolved.
- We didn't go into details on why we get frustrated with each other.
- Good ideas got interrupted by other good ideas.
- Organizing this talk caused a lot of conflict within/with OLPC.
- Create ongoing conference committee, and assign specific duties well before events (Conf. chair, venue, food, program, speakers, sponsors, A/V, moderators, funding,...)
- Ask for use of World Bank teleconferencing network (80 locations around the world) [I have some experience with this--Mokurai 03:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)]
- Bigger conference with more people and multiple sessions divided into tracks (some selection from topics like Constructionism, Activities, Glucose, Health, Textbooks, Content, Localization, Translation, Outreach...)
- Bring in teachers, researchers from education schools, subject matter experts, children!,...
- Field trips to schools using XOs