Oversight Board/Meeting Minutes-2016-04-01

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Attendees

Oversight board members
walterbender, llaske, Canoeberry, tony376, Claudia, JM, ElVerma
Community members
kaametza, GrannieB, icarito, samsongoddy, Quozl', davelab6, cjl, satellit_e, tonyF

Agenda

  1. GSoC (walterbender, 19:02:09) #
  2. I18n (walterbender, 19:07:28)
  3. Sugar Vision (walterbender, 19:45:27)
  4. Proposal for rules of removal and appointment of SLOB members (walterbender, 19:58:49)
  5. Treasurer motion

GSoC

Walter reported that we had 62 applications, of which 23 seem to be serious candidates, We will narrow the field down over the next week and submit a proposal to Google for the number of slots requested.

i18n

Tony led a discussion of the Translation Manager role. Adam and Walter suggested a reporting schedule be added to the list of duties.

Action
Tony will circulate a revised proposal ASAP for an email vote.

Due to the impasse regarding the manager role, we did not discuss any other i18n proposals at the meeting.

Vision

Lionel led a discussion regarding a update to the Sugar Labs vision statement. It is a working document and edits are welcome.

Removals

Adam made a motion, seconded by Walter

Motion
In keeping with the board 2010's decision on this matter from a different era, it was suggest that if a Board Member (1) fails to vote and attend pre-scheduled Board meetings for more than 12 weeks, (2) resigns or (3) dies, then the Board is empowered and encouraged to appoint a replacement for this seat. Finally, just a clarification that the Replacement Board Member would be required to defend their seat during the very next election.

The motion passed unanimously, 7 votes in favor.

Treasurer

We briefly discussed a proposal by GrannieB to create a treasurer position. It was pointed out that we have such a position already, but it is unfilled. No suggestions were made as to how we fill that position.

There was some discussion regarding whether or not to give the treasurer a discretionary spending budget. We await an argument as to why this is necessary as no evidence was presented.

Log

The meeting log is available at [1].