Open main menu
Home
Random
Log in
Settings
About Sugar Labs
Disclaimers
Sugar Labs
Search
Changes
← Older edit
Talk:Development Team/Release/0.82
(view source)
Revision as of 12:46, 8 April 2009
No change in size
,
12:46, 8 April 2009
m
Talk:DevelopmentTeam/Release/0.82
moved to
Talk:Development Team/Release/0.82
Line 17:
Line 17:
I think we should just be flexible in this respect:
I think we should just be flexible in this respect:
−
* In the normal case maintainers of activities included in the Sugar
+
* In the normal case maintainers of activities included in the Sugar release process should be willing to follow the schedule, i.e. provide
−
release process should be willing to follow the schedule, i.e. provide
+
development and stable releases more or less in sync with the Sugar process.
−
development and stable releases more or less in sync with the Sugar
+
* If there is a need to skip a development cycle (for example because the developers are working on large features or refactoring of the
−
process.
−
* If there is a need to skip a development cycle (for example because
−
the developers are working on large features or refactoring of the
code) it's fine to do so.
code) it's fine to do so.
−
* Activities are encouraged to release stable updates outside the
+
* Activities are encouraged to release stable updates outside the Sugar dev cycle when there is need to do so.
−
Sugar dev cycle when there is need to do so.
:> In some cases, there is more than one choice for a core activity:
:> In some cases, there is more than one choice for a core activity:
Dfarning
2,751
edits