Changes

no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
In eduJam Rafael, Reuben and Gonzalo did a review of pending patches:  
+
{{Obsolete|Moved and died at https://sugardextrose.org/projects/dextrose/wiki/Patches_state}}
    
Resources:
 
Resources:
Line 6: Line 6:     
http://dev.activitycentral.com/issues/18
 
http://dev.activitycentral.com/issues/18
 +
 +
Activity Central Priority Patches list & Status: [[Dextrose/3/ACPriorityPatches]]
    
= Ready to upstream =  
 
= Ready to upstream =  
Line 63: Line 65:  
== Add font dpi schema (Jorge Saldivar) ==
 
== Add font dpi schema (Jorge Saldivar) ==
   −
Needs to be analized for post - GTK3 and propose a features page.
+
Needs to be analyzed for post - GTK3 and propose a features page.
    
Old feature page http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Font_configuration
 
Old feature page http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Font_configuration
   −
[anish]
+
* Assigned to: Anish (m_anish)
 +
* Current status: Need to review whether to include in future dextrose. (Needs some testing, after which it may be dropped)
 +
 
 +
* Quoting Sascha <silbe@activitycentral.com> verbatim:
    +
Used in combination with sugar-settings-manager. Should probably have never been in sugar, but rather in sugar-settings-manager. sugar-settings-manager apparently didn't work reliably and was dropped from Dextrose 2, never shipped in Dextrose 3. We should check whether we still need this (for configuring global default font settings) in GTK 3 world and try to use upstream gnome-settings-daemon rather than duplicating its functionality.
    
= Need design reviews =
 
= Need design reviews =
Line 75: Line 81:     
http://git.sugarlabs.org/dextrose/mainline/blobs/bleeding-edge/rpms/sugar/0042-Database-support-for-3G-control-panel.patch
 
http://git.sugarlabs.org/dextrose/mainline/blobs/bleeding-edge/rpms/sugar/0042-Database-support-for-3G-control-panel.patch
[anish. Ready for upstream after design review]
      +
* Assigned to: Anish (m_ainsh)
 +
* Current status/Blockers: This probably requires porting some of the code in model.py to be NM 0.9 compliant. A simple port of this patch to mainline didnt work out of the box (preliminary attempt)
    
== Notification enhancements (Martin Abente) ==
 
== Notification enhancements (Martin Abente) ==
Line 115: Line 122:  
Does this needs CPU cycles, suspend resume behavior?, Using it only with the fram is open.
 
Does this needs CPU cycles, suspend resume behavior?, Using it only with the fram is open.
   −
[anish: checkout design discussions, can we upstream?]
+
* Assigned to: Anish (m_anish)
 
+
* CUrrent status: Not ported
 +
* Blockers:
 +
** Design issues. Fixing the sad face
 +
** Heuristic issues. The heuristic needs to be ARM compliant.
 +
** Disagreement on whether such numbers should be made visible in the fashion they are with this implementation.
 +
* Action: Check and update feature page.
    
== Operations over multiple files in the journal ==
 
== Operations over multiple files in the journal ==
Line 166: Line 178:  
Bug reference: https://dev.laptop.org.au/issues/1028
 
Bug reference: https://dev.laptop.org.au/issues/1028
   −
[Ajay?]
+
Assigned to : Ajay
 
[DISCUSS how to implement this]
 
[DISCUSS how to implement this]
      
= Bugs to solve =  
 
= Bugs to solve =