Difference between revisions of "Talk:Features/Server Objects Sharing"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (+1 school server, more description needed)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
* Agree the school server can be used for this purpose.
 
* Agree the school server can be used for this purpose.
also this feature should describe what kind of objects do we want to share, the obvious thinking, is that these are journal objects, but the page doesn't do the description..
+
also this feature should describe what kind of objects do we want to share, the obvious thinking, is that these are journal objects, but the page doesn't do the description..(fixed [[User:Alsroot|Alsroot]] 10:10, 17 July 2009 (UTC))
 
[[User:RafaelOrtiz|Rafael]].
 
[[User:RafaelOrtiz|Rafael]].
 +
 +
btw, school server is (according to [[School Server]]) just a general-purpose server, what web engine it should use; the idea is having this features in 0.86 w/o much coding in sugar, so all stuff should do on server side(like AMO does).

Revision as of 06:10, 17 July 2009

Considered using the school server for this? If/when we have backup, users could go to their backup page and set which entries they want to be public. tomeu 08:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Agree the school server can be used for this purpose.

also this feature should describe what kind of objects do we want to share, the obvious thinking, is that these are journal objects, but the page doesn't do the description..(fixed Alsroot 10:10, 17 July 2009 (UTC)) Rafael.

btw, school server is (according to School Server) just a general-purpose server, what web engine it should use; the idea is having this features in 0.86 w/o much coding in sugar, so all stuff should do on server side(like AMO does).