Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vision proposal 2016"
(Add 2008 PR) |
(Add fcacebook tactic note) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[https://www.sugarlabs.org/2008/05/15/New-foundation-focused-on-taking-the-Sugar-user-interface-to-the-next-level-of-usability-and-utility/ Original 2008 Press Release] [[User:Davelab6|Davelab6]] ([[User talk:Davelab6|talk]]) | [https://www.sugarlabs.org/2008/05/15/New-foundation-focused-on-taking-the-Sugar-user-interface-to-the-next-level-of-usability-and-utility/ Original 2008 Press Release] [[User:Davelab6|Davelab6]] ([[User talk:Davelab6|talk]]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | "I think facebook app/game versions of sugar activities is smart marketing, but I would suggest making them a little limited, to get people hooked on them, and then telling people to upgrade to the main http://server.sugarizer.org app to play the next level. | ||
| + | You are probably more familiar than I am with the facebook free basics fiasco. Facebook seeks to establish itself as a grand gateway to what the internet can do, and the software freedom movement yearns to make Facebook obsolete. (eg, see https://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2010/feb/10/highlights-eben-moglens-freedom-cloud-talk/) One of the ideas of Sugar is to raise awareness about the software freedom movement, and as such, providing the full experience within the facebook police-state playpark is an own-goal. We should reach people where they are in the playpark and lead them out of it. " [[User:Davelab6|Davelab6]] ([[User talk:Davelab6|talk]]) | ||
Revision as of 09:54, 7 April 2016
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Design_Team/Vision image is broken, but could be relevant Davelab6 (talk)
I see many posts to the mailing list by newcomers going unanswered. I see the lack of an official Sugar Labs annual general meeting (although Finances shows some funding of meetings.) I see the lack of a vision that is kept current. Therefore I propose a "Welcoming Commitee" and a "Events Committee": The role of the SL President includes reviewing and resetting the vision of the organization every 12 months, organizing the Events Commitee to run an annual Sugar Labs Summit where the vision is presented and discussed, and running the welcoming commitee to welcoming each new member of the community as they arrive and speaking with them until they contribute or drop out; and speaking with them at least once every 3 months to encourage and involve them. Davelab6 (talk)
http://people.sugarlabs.org/walter/docs/bender-kyoto-talk-2013.pdf could be relevant Davelab6 (talk)
What_is_Sugar? could be relevant Davelab6 (talk)
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Roadmap has many relevant points Davelab6 (talk)
2011 Local Labs statements
- Chile: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2011-September/014059.html
- Peru: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2011-September/014034.html
- Germany: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2011-September/014035.html
Original 2008 Press Release Davelab6 (talk)
"I think facebook app/game versions of sugar activities is smart marketing, but I would suggest making them a little limited, to get people hooked on them, and then telling people to upgrade to the main http://server.sugarizer.org app to play the next level.
You are probably more familiar than I am with the facebook free basics fiasco. Facebook seeks to establish itself as a grand gateway to what the internet can do, and the software freedom movement yearns to make Facebook obsolete. (eg, see https://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2010/feb/10/highlights-eben-moglens-freedom-cloud-talk/) One of the ideas of Sugar is to raise awareness about the software freedom movement, and as such, providing the full experience within the facebook police-state playpark is an own-goal. We should reach people where they are in the playpark and lead them out of it. " Davelab6 (talk)