10,502
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − Benjamin M. Schwartz has proposed a taxonomy for the various Sugar components to remedy an ongoing naming problem. − − "I think Sugar has a naming problem. There are a lot of different digital − objects being produced by this project, and referring to all of them as − Sugar is becoming increasingly confusing. For example, the discussion − about "Sugar on Windows" has been all but incomprehensible, because each − author means something entirely different by the term "Sugar". Similarly, − the recent proposals for "inclusion in Sugar" are extremely confusing, − since these components will not be required to run Sugar. − − "To resolve this, I am going to attempt to list a number of important, − distinct digital objects that this work has produced. I will also − introduce cutesy codenames. I hope that the Sugar developers will adopt a − clear set of distinct names, and I do not care if they choose these names − or other names." −
moving initial discussion to discussion page
==Sweet: The abstract design of the interface==
==Sweet: The abstract design of the interface==