Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,368 bytes added ,  18:48, 30 March 2013
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  +
= Bernie Innocenti =
 +
 
[[Image:Bernie.png|thumb|none|not really me]]
 
[[Image:Bernie.png|thumb|none|not really me]]
   −
:Personal homepage: http://www.codewiz.org/
   
:e-mail: bernie AT codewiz DOT org
 
:e-mail: bernie AT codewiz DOT org
 
:IRC: _bernie, hanging on #sugar on FreeNet
 
:IRC: _bernie, hanging on #sugar on FreeNet
:Old OLPC projects: http://www.codewiz.org/wiki/OneLaptopPerChild
+
:Jabber: bernie AT codewiz DOT org (yes, I run my own Jabber server ;-)
 +
:PGP key: [http://keys.sugarlabs.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x71FF4BAC 71FF4BAC]
 +
:Contact info: http://codewiz.org/wiki/ContactInformation
 +
 
 +
:Personal homepage: http://codewiz.org/
 +
:Resume: http://codewiz.org/wiki/AbridgedResume
 +
:LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/codewiz
 +
:Previous OLPC projects: http://codewiz.org/wiki/OneLaptopPerChild
 +
 
 +
I'm a volunteer working for the [[Sugar Labs]] foundation. Before that, I was a
 +
full-time volunteer developer at OLPC. My job was hacking on X11, the base Fedora OS,
 +
the Linux kernel, some i18n and input work. I have also worked on-site at OLPC deployments
 +
in Nepal, Paraguay, Uruguay and Mozambique.
 +
 
 +
== Oversight Board Platform ==
 +
 
 +
'''The open source method is based on participation, not consumption.'''
 +
 
 +
To position itself as THE educational environment of the future, Sugar needs
 +
to grow a larger user and developer base.  This is only possible if we keep
 +
growing as a truly community-driven project with its own independent identity.
   −
I'm a volunteer working for the Sugar Labs team.
+
=== Goals for Sugar Labs ===
   −
Until February 2008, I was a full time volunteer developer at OLPC.  My job was hacking X, the base Fedora OS, the Linux kernel, some i18n and input work.  Later on, until April 2008, I was CTO of OLPC Europe and traveled around to present our project to government officials and dignitaries.
+
0. Engage deployments in leading roles within Sugar Labs
    +
1. Further enhance our public-facing web presence and development infrastructure
   −
== Why we should be more open ==
+
2. Work with multiple hardware and OS vendors to make Sugar available to
 +
the widest-possible user base
   −
(I wrote the following note in 2007 while still working at 1cc)
+
3. Foster the creation of companies and groups offering professional Sugar
 +
consulting and outsourcing
   −
Openness will be our greatest and most lasting strength. If we shy away
+
4. Continue to enroll volunteer community members in key roles of our
from it now it will never return.
+
infrastructure and public relations
  -- [[User:Sj|Samuel Klein]]
+
 
 +
5. Raise funding to sponsor developer meetings and our presence at major
 +
international events
 +
 
 +
=== Anti-goals for Sugar Labs ===
 +
 
 +
-1. Hire a large team of software developers – this would end up discouraging
 +
outside contributors
 +
 
 +
-2. Brew a custom OS platform – we work with distributors, we don't compete against
 +
them
 +
 
 +
-3. Let Sugar Labs become unfairly biased towards specific partners –
 +
that would undermine our relationships with other partners
 +
 
 +
-4. Trade project autonomy for funding or support – we're glad to offer our
 +
services, not our souls
 +
 
 +
=== Personal agenda ===
   −
"We should be more open" may strike many as a surprising suggestion
+
Within a few years computers will become central in primary education world-wide.
for OLPC, since it's already supposed to be one of the most open
+
This will stimulate the creation of a new industry of hardware, software, and
projects out there.
+
content for schools. Sugar is currently well positioned: it has greater momentum
 +
and several competitive advantages over any proprietary platform on the horizon.
   −
But opening just the source without opening the rest of the
+
I work with deployments and commercial entities interested in Sugar development.
development process is a recurring pitfall in which even
+
To build local capacity, I'm coordinating small teams of Sugar hackers focused on
large corporates such as RedHat and Sun all fell, initially.
+
service and support. Internet is our office. In the future, I'd like to work
I see us likely to fall into the same circular thinking that
+
with hardware vendors with the goal of making Sugar available across all educational
"trying to involve external contributors does not pay off
+
platforms.
because so far we've got so little external contributions".
     −
And I've heard the argument that "working on our platform would
+
== On openness ==
be too hard for outside contributors".  This can't possibly be
  −
true: projects like OpenWRT and the Linux kernel and dozens of
  −
RTOS projects out there regularly attract flocks of hackers who
  −
are very capable of working on all kinds of fancy and undocumented
  −
hardware and exotic OSes, with great results.
     −
My access point can now play MP3s :-)
+
Openness will be our greatest and most lasting strength.  If we shy away
 +
from it now it will never return.
 +
  -- [[User:Sj|Samuel Klein]]

Navigation menu