Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | {{draft}}
| |
| == Present == | | == Present == |
| ;Board members: Walter Bender, James Cameron (chair), Samson Goddy, Lionel Laské, Alex Perez, Devin Ulibarri, and Claudia Urrea. | | ;Board members: Walter Bender, James Cameron (chair), Samson Goddy, Lionel Laské, Alex Perez, Devin Ulibarri, and Claudia Urrea. |
Line 15: |
Line 14: |
| == Receive Report from Project Representative == | | == Receive Report from Project Representative == |
| | | |
− | Report was made by project representative (Conservancy liaison);
| + | James Cameron made a report as Conservancy liaison. |
| | | |
| Ours and another project's travel policy exemption request were considered by the Conservancy board, but they decided not to grant either, because of the increased work and the number of exemptions they had already granted to all projects. The other project's exemption was due to illness. Our exemption was due to our own failure to communicate. | | Ours and another project's travel policy exemption request were considered by the Conservancy board, but they decided not to grant either, because of the increased work and the number of exemptions they had already granted to all projects. The other project's exemption was due to illness. Our exemption was due to our own failure to communicate. |
Line 33: |
Line 32: |
| == Receive Report from Google Summer of Code Sugar Labs organisation administrator == | | == Receive Report from Google Summer of Code Sugar Labs organisation administrator == |
| | | |
− | Report was made by Google Summer of Code Sugar Labs organisation administrator;
| + | Walter Bender made a report. |
| | | |
| * we have been accepted, | | * we have been accepted, |
| * we have proposal ideas, see https://github.com/sugarlabs/GSoC, | | * we have proposal ideas, see https://github.com/sugarlabs/GSoC, |
| * we have consent from Conservancy, | | * we have consent from Conservancy, |
− | * we will hold off inviting mentors until proposals arrive; so that we know what sort of proposals we are getting, and so that participants do not design their proposals to meet requirements of mentors, | + | * we will hold off inviting mentors until proposals arrive; so that we know what sort of proposals we are getting |
− | * we may designative a main mentor on each idea, to help with approval of proposals,
| |
| * we can still add more project ideas, | | * we can still add more project ideas, |
| * we can encourage participation, | | * we can encourage participation, |
| * Walter is doing outreach in Nigeria, and will advertise at Open Edx talk, | | * Walter is doing outreach in Nigeria, and will advertise at Open Edx talk, |
| + | |
| + | We discussed; |
| + | * the hold off will also help make sure that participants do not design their proposals to meet requirements of mentors, |
| + | * we may designative a main mentor on each idea, to help with approval of proposals, |
| * we should update project ideas in repository in response to proposals and any discussions, | | * we should update project ideas in repository in response to proposals and any discussions, |
− | * as board members have a responsibility to be aware of the event, and may nominate as mentors in order to do so, | + | * as board members have a responsibility to be aware of the event, we may nominate as mentors in order to do so, |
| | | |
| == SCALE 17x == | | == SCALE 17x == |
Line 61: |
Line 63: |
| | | |
| == Introductory Tasks == | | == Introductory Tasks == |
| + | |
| + | James made a report; |
| | | |
| We create issues for introductory tasks that we don't have time to do ourselves. We get criticism of the tasks, but very little support from other developers defending the tasks. | | We create issues for introductory tasks that we don't have time to do ourselves. We get criticism of the tasks, but very little support from other developers defending the tasks. |