Sugar Labs/Governance/lang-es: Difference between revisions

(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 6:

----

~~One of the challenges that~~ free ~~and~~ open-source ~~projects face is the impact of~~ governance ~~on their community members~~: ~~while~~ FOSS ~~licenses assure access to source code~~, ~~that doesn't guarantee a successful project~~. A governance ~~model can help ensure that the project is run in~~ a ~~professional, disciplined~~, ~~and equitable manner~~. ~~Good~~ governance ~~lets the community engage in discourse and provides~~ a ~~transparent mechanism for arbitration in the hopefully rare circumstances in which it is necessary~~.

Uno de los desafíos que enfrentan los proyectos de free y open-source es el impacto de la governance en los miembros de sus comunidades: mientras que las licencias FOSS aseguran el acceso al codigo, esto no garantiza un proyecto exito. Un modelo de governance puede ayudar a asegurar que el proyecto sea manejado de una manera profesional, diciplinada y equitativa. Una buena governance deja a la comunidad involucrarse en el discurso

y provee un mecanismo transparente de arbitramento en las (esperamos) raras circunstancias sen las cuales esto sea necesario.

~~Some attributes that are necessary for good~~ governance ~~include~~: ~~meritocracy~~, ~~transparency of process~~, ~~open access to anyone who has demonstrated the skills to contribute, and a means to ensure~~ a balance ~~of control so that no one special interest wrests~~ control ~~of either the discourse or the decision-making~~.

Algunos atributos que son importantes para una buena governance incluyen: meritocracia, transparencia de, acceso abierto a cualquiera que haya demostrado las habilidades para contribuir y medios para asegurar balance en el control de el discurso o la toma de decisiones.

===Software Freedom Conservancy===

Line 18:

Line 19:

===Oversight Board===

To avoid confusion, Sugar Labs will not have “directors”, since that attribution within the SFC is already taken to mean the board members of the Conservancy itself. Therefore, the central administrative body of Sugar Labs is termed the [[~~Sugar Labs/Governance/~~Oversight_Board|Oversight Board]].

To avoid confusion, Sugar Labs will not have “directors”, since that attribution within the SFC is already taken to mean the board members of the Conservancy itself. Therefore, the central administrative body of Sugar Labs is termed the [[Oversight_Board|Oversight Board]].

Sugar Labs shall be governed by an Oversight Board, consisting of seven (7) members, elected annually by the Sugar community—the Sugar Membership. The Oversight Board shall meet at least once per quarter to discuss various topics pertaining to the regular activities of the Sugar Labs Project and Sugar. (It is expected that more frequent meeting will be required in the early stages of the program.) The minutes to these meetings shall be posted publicly on the Sugar Labs wiki ([[~~Sugar Labs/OversightBoard~~/Minutes]]).

Sugar Labs shall be governed by an Oversight Board, consisting of seven (7) members, elected annually by the Sugar community—the Sugar Membership. The Oversight Board shall meet at least once per quarter to discuss various topics pertaining to the regular activities of the Sugar Labs Project and Sugar. (It is expected that more frequent meeting will be required in the early stages of the program.) The minutes to these meetings shall be posted publicly on the Sugar Labs wiki ([[Oversight Board/Minutes]]).

The members of the Oversight Board may be removed from the position at any time by a majority vote of the Community Members. Upon the resignation or removal of a member of the Oversight Board, the Community Members shall elect a replacement Community Member to serve on the Oversight Board.

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ----
-One of the challenges that free and open-source projects face is the impact of governance on their community members: while FOSS licenses assure access to source code, that doesn't guarantee a successful project. A governance model can help ensure that the project is run in a professional, disciplined, and equitable manner. Good governance lets the community engage in discourse and provides a transparent mechanism for arbitration in the hopefully rare circumstances in which it is necessary.
+Uno de los desafíos que enfrentan los proyectos de  free y open-source es el impacto de la governance en los miembros de sus comunidades: mientras que las licencias FOSS aseguran el acceso al codigo, esto no garantiza un proyecto exito. Un modelo de governance puede ayudar a asegurar que el proyecto sea manejado de una manera profesional, diciplinada y equitativa. Una buena  governance deja a la comunidad involucrarse en el discurso
+y provee un mecanismo transparente de arbitramento  en las (esperamos) raras circunstancias sen las cuales esto sea necesario.
-Some attributes that are necessary for good governance include: meritocracy, transparency of process, open access to anyone who has demonstrated the skills to contribute, and a means to ensure a balance of control so that no one special interest wrests control of either the discourse or the decision-making.
+Algunos atributos que son importantes para una buena governance incluyen: meritocracia, transparencia de, acceso abierto a cualquiera que haya demostrado las habilidades para contribuir y medios para asegurar balance en el control de el discurso o la toma de decisiones.
 ===Software Freedom Conservancy===
@@ Line 18: / Line 19: @@
 ===Oversight Board===
-To avoid confusion, Sugar Labs will not have “directors”, since that attribution within the SFC is already taken to mean the board members of the Conservancy itself. Therefore, the central administrative body of Sugar Labs is termed the [[Sugar Labs/Governance/Oversight_Board|Oversight Board]].
+To avoid confusion, Sugar Labs will not have “directors”, since that attribution within the SFC is already taken to mean the board members of the Conservancy itself. Therefore, the central administrative body of Sugar Labs is termed the [[Oversight_Board|Oversight Board]].
-Sugar Labs shall be governed by an Oversight Board, consisting of seven (7) members, elected annually by the Sugar community—the Sugar Membership. The Oversight Board shall meet at least once per quarter to discuss various topics pertaining to the regular activities of the Sugar Labs Project and Sugar. (It is expected that more frequent meeting will be required in the early stages of the program.) The minutes to these meetings shall be posted publicly on the Sugar Labs wiki ([[Sugar Labs/OversightBoard/Minutes]]).
+Sugar Labs shall be governed by an Oversight Board, consisting of seven (7) members, elected annually by the Sugar community—the Sugar Membership. The Oversight Board shall meet at least once per quarter to discuss various topics pertaining to the regular activities of the Sugar Labs Project and Sugar. (It is expected that more frequent meeting will be required in the early stages of the program.) The minutes to these meetings shall be posted publicly on the Sugar Labs wiki ([[Oversight Board/Minutes]]).
 The members of the Oversight Board may be removed from the position at any time by a majority vote of the Community Members. Upon the resignation or removal of a member of the  Oversight Board, the Community Members shall elect a replacement Community Member to serve on the Oversight Board.