Talk:Running Linux Applications Under Sugar: Difference between revisions
→=Sugar Coating= Permission Denied.: new section |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
It would be helpful if I could copy screen shots to these comments. In any case the final messages for the first two commands on the OLPC were: | It would be helpful if I could copy screen shots to these comments. In any case the final messages for the first two commands on the OLPC were: | ||
2009-09-16 17:40:49 (39.9 KB/s) - 'libsugarize.so' saved [2792/2792 | 2009-09-16 17:40:49 (39.9 KB/s) - 'libsugarize.so' saved [2792/2792] | ||
and | and | ||
2009-09-16 17:53:32 (43.8 KB/s) - 'sug' saved [3776/3776 | 2009-09-16 17:53:32 (43.8 KB/s) - 'sug' saved [3776/3776] | ||
The response to ./sug was | |||
bash: ./sug: Permission denied | |||
For the chmod a+s /bin/chmod | |||
There was no response except the repeat of the prompt | |||
bash-3.2# | |||
Attempting to enter ./sug again was the Permission denied as above. | |||
It does not appear i can go any further. | It does not appear i can go any further. | ||
Any ideas. | Any ideas. | ||
== It works! == | |||
It says in the yellow box that the program won't work on newer versions of sugar but it does. Maybe we should remove this since it might discourage users from trying that idea. My sugar version is 0.96.2 Also I didn't need to restart sugar at the end of sugar coating it immediatly showed up in Home View. --[[User:Jamison Lofthouse|Jamison Lofthouse]] 10:39, 30 August 2012 (EDT) | |||
: Thanks for testing! If you can improve the page based on your experience, please do so. Thanks. --[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 10:56, 31 August 2012 (EDT) | |||