Talk:Sugar Labs/Governance: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m →Membership: fix typo + clarify |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TOCright}} | {{TOCright}} | ||
==DRAFT?== | |||
Maybe time to remove "DRAFT" from the page? | |||
==Other examples== | ==Other examples== | ||
| Line 23: | Line 27: | ||
:I've moved some of the details to subpages. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 16:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | :I've moved some of the details to subpages. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 16:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Decision | == [[Decision panels]] == | ||
This seems to be the most controversial topic: | This seems to be the most controversial topic: | ||
| Line 142: | Line 146: | ||
--Mako | --Mako | ||
To be a truly community based and perhaps a good 501c3 NonProfit, | |||
it has to serve the public good, and including those community members | |||
that are affected (i.e. users of the software, kids, teachers, | |||
family members, community members, not just developers), | |||
or underserved by the software/ product (those who don't get it, | |||
i.e. people without machines that will boot from USB/ CDR, | |||
and/or just learning what Sugar and SugarLabs/ OLPC is about), | |||
as inclusion makes a better product and | |||
better serves the public good. | |||
[[User:Danceswithcars|Danceswithcars]] 14:24, 5 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Other open details == | == Other open details == | ||