Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sugar Labs/Members/List"
< Talk:Sugar Labs | Members
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (moved Talk:Sugar Labs/Initial Members List to Talk:Sugar Labs/Members/List: more accurately reflect contents) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | == Member definition == | ||
A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of Sugar Labs". [[User:Sj|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC) | A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of Sugar Labs". [[User:Sj|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
:From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC) | :From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Member wiki page == | ||
+ | ''Proposal'': let's make the member names links to the user pages [[User:Bernie|bernie]] 18:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | : I second that proposal. Members should be asked to maintain User: page. --[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 13:11, 24 September 2010 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 12:11, 24 September 2010
Member definition
A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of Sugar Labs". +sj + 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --Walter 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Member wiki page
Proposal: let's make the member names links to the user pages bernie 18:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- I second that proposal. Members should be asked to maintain User: page. --FGrose 13:11, 24 September 2010 (EDT)