User:Alsroot/trash/Activity as a regular Journal Object: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<noinclude>{{GoogleTrans-en}}{{TOCright}}</noinclude>
+<noinclude>{{GoogleTrans-en}}{{TOCright}}
+[[Category:FeatureObsoleted|Activity as a regular Journal Object]]</noinclude>
-<!-- All fields on this form are required to be accepted.
- We also request that you maintain the same order of sections so that all of the feature pages are uniform.  -->
-<!-- The actual name of your feature page should look something like: Features/Your Feature Name.  This keeps all features in the same namespace -->
 == Summary ==
@@ Line 42: / Line 38: @@
 * feature eliminates confusion, e.g. in case of removing activities, when there are activities(in Home view) and .xo bundles in the Journal(that could be absent - .xo deleted, system activity)
-* let users, that are not experienced in command line applications, copy existed activity(even system) just by draging Journal entry to USB source
+* let users, that are not experienced in command line applications, copy existed activity(even system) just by draging Journal(or Home) entry to USB source
 * since all activities have Journal representation, keep useful information in entry fields(time of installing activity, additional info in description etc.)
+* so, it simplifies situation - user all time has in mind that he is working with the same object(activity) but from different views(Home or Journal)
 == Scope ==
@@ Line 83: / Line 80: @@
 * [[Features/Object Bundles]]
 * Email threads
+** [http://www.mail-archive.com/sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org/msg10708.html Activity as a regular Journal Object request for inclusion to 0.88]
 ** [http://www.mail-archive.com/sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org/msg07572.html multiple activity versions installed simultaneously]
 ** [http://www.mail-archive.com/sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org/msg06944.html Activity as regular objects proposal]