Difference between revisions of "Oversight Board/2010/Meeting Minutes-2010-01-15"
< Oversight Board | 2010
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(→Log) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
== Log == | == Log == | ||
| − | [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Log-2010-01-15|Meeting Log]] | + | [[Oversight_Board/2010/Meeting_Log-2010-01-15|Meeting Log]] |
[[Category:Oversight board]] | [[Category:Oversight board]] | ||
[[Category:Meeting minutes]] | [[Category:Meeting minutes]] | ||
[[Category:Decision panels]] | [[Category:Decision panels]] | ||
Latest revision as of 23:26, 1 March 2011
In attendance:
SLOB members: walter, tomeu, seandaly, mchua, canoeberry, bernie (cjb made a brief appearance)
Some community members (including sdziallas and stickster) attended the meeting.
Agenda
- Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark
- Fedora use of Sugar Trademark [1]
- Infrastructure
- Finances
Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark
We got into even more details the modifications to the trademark policy. We added new language:
- 'sweetened by' as proposed from the Marketing Team;
- asked for written permission in Sections 2a and 2b;
- included information about how to ask for written permission in Section 2;
- clarified the language in Section 5a;
- added some language regarding our intentions to be cooperative in the preamble.
Action: Everyone will do a final read/revision over the next week.
Fedora use of Sugar Trademark
We answered some questions from Fedora regarding our trademark [2]:
- Does SL currently own the SoaS trademark?
- We do own the SoaS trademark (pending) and will protect it.
- Do we also agree that the Fedora SoaS spin is eligible to be called SoaS?
- Yes.
Finances
Not discussed.
Infrastructure
Not discussed.
Next meeting
Friday, 22 January 2010 16:00 UTC (Note: We will again be meeting one hour later than usual.)