Open Badges: Difference between revisions

Line 45:

'''The model is based on autoevaluation, then only active edition of the above Wiki text by each wiki user''' will change any name from '''List A''' to '''List B'''.

Once the pilot starts returning feedback to the community, the sustainability of the program will depend on our capacity to facilitate new active contributors identification and if and when necessary, friendly and open democratic process for selecting and/or nominating badges and badge holders.

'''Other Pilot Guidelines and Notes'''

'''~~Program~~ Guidelines'''

- Reasonable periods of time should be given for Community members to nominate themselves or another member as a Badge nominee in upcoming rounds.

Line 55:

Line 53:

- By default all nominated active contributors are considered as '''not''' in need of financial resources (List A).

- For the purpose of simplifying bureaucracy for the pilot, I (laura_vargas) as an organizational engineer to the best of my knowledge and eliminating every possible conflict of interest attached to the proposal, have formulated the initial Sugar Labs Open Badges list as published on March 3, 2017.

~~The deadline to such edition it could be one day before the following Oversight Board meeting. I (laura_vargas) have added Samuel in List A only as an example, as he has already stated at IAEP.~~

~~the after a reasonable period of time everyone who is not~~

Please add your if you are a nominated active contributor for the your name to the correspondent list and update if necessary the following Budget numbers if you consider your self as an active contributor in need of financial resources for the 2017 Open Badges round.

==== ~~Summarizing the Pilot: 2017~~ Budget for Open Badges ~~round~~ ====

==== Budget for 2017 Open Badges ====

Total active contributors self identified as in need of financial resources = 1

Total monthly need of financial resources = US$ 500

Total Budget for 2017 Round = US$ 6,000

=== References ===

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 '''The model is based on autoevaluation, then only active edition of the above Wiki text by each wiki user''' will change any name from '''List A''' to '''List B'''.
-Once the pilot starts returning feedback to the community, the sustainability of the program will depend on our capacity to facilitate new active contributors identification and if and when necessary, friendly and open democratic process for selecting and/or nominating badges and badge holders.
+'''Other Pilot Guidelines and Notes'''
-'''Program Guidelines'''
 - Reasonable periods of time should be given for Community members to nominate themselves or another member as a Badge nominee in upcoming rounds.
@@ Line 55: / Line 53: @@
 - By default all nominated active contributors are considered as '''not''' in need of financial resources (List A).
 - For the purpose of simplifying bureaucracy for the pilot, I (laura_vargas) as an organizational engineer to the best of my knowledge and eliminating every possible conflict of interest attached to the proposal, have formulated the initial Sugar Labs Open Badges list as published on March 3, 2017.
-The deadline to such edition it could be one day before the following Oversight Board meeting. I (laura_vargas) have added Samuel in List A only as an example, as he has already stated at IAEP.
-the after a reasonable period of time everyone who is not
-Please add your if you are a nominated active contributor for the  your name to the correspondent list and update if necessary the following Budget numbers if you consider your self as an active contributor in need of financial resources for the 2017 Open Badges round.
-==== Summarizing the Pilot: 2017 Budget for Open Badges round ====
+==== Budget for 2017 Open Badges  ====
 Total active contributors self identified as in need of financial resources = 1
 Total monthly need of financial resources = US$ 500
 Total Budget for 2017 Round = US$ 6,000
 === References ===