Oversight Board/Meeting Minutes-2019-04-05: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

@@ Line 75: / Line 75: @@
 == Fedora 30 release ==
-One of our target distributions is all set to release with Sugar 0.112 and broken collaboration on the 16th April.
+One of our target distributions is all set to release with Sugar 0.112 and broken collaboration on the 16th April, yet 0.113 contains some fixes for collaboration.
+We discussed;
+* Simon Schampijer (AKA erikos) is listed as the current Fedora Sugar package maintainer,
 We did not make a decision.
@@ Line 90: / Line 93: @@
 == Sugarizer missing from sugar-devel@ ==
+Discussions about Sugarizer are not only not happening on sugar-devel@, but questions about Sugarizer are not being answered, and students could not find Lionel's mail address.
+Lionel agreed to add his mail address to his GitHub profile.
 == Complaints ==
+Samson has received confidential complaints about Sugar Labs;
+* we are unsafe, rude, and don't want to listen,
+* we don't take our vision seriously,
+We discussed;
+* who we are,
+* this is an important issue,
+* newcomers can think their ideas are wonderful,
+* careful replies are seen as condescending,
+* possibility of anonymous suggestion box, risks of further trolling,
+* need to accommodate new and veteran contributors, ... let them make mistakes and learn,
+* we are all very pressured time-size,
+* possibility of a survey,
+* how asking questions about a problem makes a problem larger,
+* it is so boring to repeat the same advice over and over,
+* we might ask our Ombudsman to investigate,
+* we have a welcome to Sugar Labs checklist, (lists the skills and achievements to attain),
+* private complaints should be public so the community can react,
+* use more empathy,
+* a perception of non-inclusiveness, caused by using wrong forum, code of conduct,
 Meeting closed at around 21:20.