Difference between revisions of "Marketing Team/Events/FOSDEM 2009/Notes"
< Marketing Team | Events | FOSDEM 2009
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ChristophD (talk | contribs) |
ChristophD (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
** a few thousand dollars have been collected via individual donations | ** a few thousand dollars have been collected via individual donations | ||
** no success in getting grants so far | ** no success in getting grants so far | ||
− | ** | + | ** Sugar Labs has no employees, should work like the Gnome foundation, people getting paid by companies who want Sugar to suceed |
− | ** | + | ** in the larger context SugarLabs should be responsible for high-levels decisions and setting the framework for activities |
+ | ** focus on setting up Local Sugar Labs, have direct | ||
== FOSDEM'09 == | == FOSDEM'09 == | ||
== Other Notes == | == Other Notes == |
Revision as of 06:41, 8 February 2009
Pre-conference community meetup
- Bernie gives an overview of the current state of Sugar Labs
- infrastructure (servers, services, etc.) in in place
- mode of governance has been established
- getting away from the old mindset (thinking like a company, asking for permission before doing something)
- show me the code, we will support you but you should do things yourself
- SugarLabs is a community not a company
- more developers are needed
- people should be pointed to join.sugarlabs.org
- a few thousand dollars have been collected via individual donations
- no success in getting grants so far
- Sugar Labs has no employees, should work like the Gnome foundation, people getting paid by companies who want Sugar to suceed
- in the larger context SugarLabs should be responsible for high-levels decisions and setting the framework for activities
- focus on setting up Local Sugar Labs, have direct