Activities/Activity Library: Difference between revisions
Created page with '<noinclude> {{GoogleTrans-en}} {{TOCright}} Library </noinclude> == Ideas == * support 0install by design ** use .xo format only if user requested .xo c…' |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
** successful/failed launch of what SP, could be useful to judge activity stability | ** successful/failed launch of what SP, could be useful to judge activity stability | ||
** average time of using/number of launches/etc | ** average time of using/number of launches/etc | ||
=== Hierarchy of libraries === | |||
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 01:58:34PM +0000, Aleksey Lim wrote: | |||
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 08:46:06AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote: | |||
> > Will it support multiple libraries, for the same of decentralizing | |||
> > things? | |||
> > | |||
> > I can imagine that many deployments would want a hierarchical thing to | |||
> > save bandwidth and delegate decisions to school principals: the | |||
> > schoolserver would be the first place where children search for | |||
> > activities, then would come the deployment server and lastly ASLO. | |||
> | |||
> Thanks, this hierarchical structure will be useful not only on pure | |||
> server side but on peers side as well, like: | |||
> | |||
> * someone added bunch of cool activities to his list (w/o | |||
> downloading|launching them) | |||
> * shares his Activity_Library instance | |||
> * any joined user can see|download|launch these activities | |||