User:Inkyfingers/Testing Sweets: Difference between revisions
Inkyfingers (talk | contribs) What would an experienced user do next? |
Inkyfingers (talk | contribs) Ready for feedback! |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Under construction| | {{Under construction|Ready for feedback!.--[[User:Inkyfingers|Inkyfingers]] 02:35, 20 December 2011 (EST)}} | ||
Mint-12 successful install notes here: [[Talk:Platform Team/Guide/Sugar via Sweets#Installing Sugar via sweets - in Mint-12]] | ==Mint-12 successful install== | ||
==try this== | notes here: [[Talk:Platform Team/Guide/Sugar via Sweets#Installing Sugar via sweets - in Mint-12]] | ||
===try this=== | |||
:http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Sweets_Distribution | :http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Sweets_Distribution | ||
:works fine for 11.04 Linux Mint 11 I did this and it worked but alsroot wanted me to not put it on the wiki. It installs sweets-sugar 0.94.1 [[User:Satellit]] 9 Dec 2011 | :works fine for 11.04 Linux Mint 11 I did this and it worked but alsroot wanted me to not put it on the wiki. It installs sweets-sugar 0.94.1 [[User:Satellit]] 9 Dec 2011 | ||
== Exploring extra documentation == | == Exploring extra documentation == | ||
Expanding central section of [[Platform_Team/Guide/Sweets_Usage]]] ... | |||
=== Aim of this paper === | === Aim of this paper === | ||
'''What are the opportunities of improving documentation for users at a certain point, after install and before successful launch?''' | '''What are the opportunities of improving documentation for users at a certain point, after install and before successful launch?''' | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
''Alternatively, {{Code|sweets}} might be run from the [[Platform_Team/Guide/Sweets_Packaging#Run_Sweets_from_sources|sources]].'' | ''Alternatively, {{Code|sweets}} might be run from the [[Platform_Team/Guide/Sweets_Packaging#Run_Sweets_from_sources|sources]].'' | ||
:Issue 2. This idea needs dealing with at an appropriate level. Is this an alternative for our reader? Under what conditions would the reader start on this method | :Issue 2. This idea needs dealing with at an appropriate level. Is this an alternative for our reader? Under what conditions would the reader start on this method? | ||
=== Upgrade === | === Upgrade === | ||