|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Benjamin M. Schwartz has proposed a taxonomy for the various Sugar components to remedy an ongoing naming problem.
| |
|
| |
| "I think Sugar has a naming problem. There are a lot of different digital
| |
| objects being produced by this project, and referring to all of them as
| |
| Sugar is becoming increasingly confusing. For example, the discussion
| |
| about "Sugar on Windows" has been all but incomprehensible, because each
| |
| author means something entirely different by the term "Sugar". Similarly,
| |
| the recent proposals for "inclusion in Sugar" are extremely confusing,
| |
| since these components will not be required to run Sugar.
| |
|
| |
| "To resolve this, I am going to attempt to list a number of important,
| |
| distinct digital objects that this work has produced. I will also
| |
| introduce cutesy codenames. I hope that the Sugar developers will adopt a
| |
| clear set of distinct names, and I do not care if they choose these names
| |
| or other names."
| |
|
| |
| ==Sweet: The abstract design of the interface== | | ==Sweet: The abstract design of the interface== |
|
| |
|