Changes

:::: Yes, because [[Sugar_Labs/FAQ#What_are_the_principles_that_guide_Sugar_Labs.3F|individual activities may be under different licenses]], which could be GPL incompatible.  Also, [http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/pages/developer_faq#license activities.sugarlabs.org] supports other license types.  Seems vague overall.  It doesn't seem to be clear if a learner can use a GPL incompatible license for an activity they write and share with their friends.  My opinion is that a learner should be free to use an incompatible license.  COPYING file in sugar-toolkit-gtk3 does say GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), which permits linking from a body of work that is incompatibly licensed.  --[[User:Quozl|Quozl]] ([[User talk:Quozl|talk]]) 01:12, 20 April 2016 (EDT)

:::: Yes, because [[Sugar_Labs/FAQ#What_are_the_principles_that_guide_Sugar_Labs.3F|individual activities may be under different licenses]], which could be GPL incompatible.  Also, [http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/pages/developer_faq#license activities.sugarlabs.org] supports other license types.  Seems vague overall.  It doesn't seem to be clear if a learner can use a GPL incompatible license for an activity they write and share with their friends.  My opinion is that a learner should be free to use an incompatible license.  COPYING file in sugar-toolkit-gtk3 does say GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), which permits linking from a body of work that is incompatibly licensed.  --[[User:Quozl|Quozl]] ([[User talk:Quozl|talk]]) 01:12, 20 April 2016 (EDT)