Talk:Vision proposal 2016: Difference between revisions

Line 38:

:::: Yes, because [[Sugar_Labs/FAQ#What_are_the_principles_that_guide_Sugar_Labs.3F|individual activities may be under different licenses]], which could be GPL incompatible. Also, [http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/pages/developer_faq#license activities.sugarlabs.org] supports other license types. Seems vague overall. It doesn't seem to be clear if a learner can use a GPL incompatible license for an activity they write and share with their friends. My opinion is that a learner should be free to use an incompatible license. COPYING file in sugar-toolkit-gtk3 does say GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), which permits linking from a body of work that is incompatibly licensed. --[[User:Quozl|Quozl]] ([[User talk:Quozl|talk]]) 01:12, 20 April 2016 (EDT)

::::: I'll raise the topic on IAEP :) [[User:Davelab6|Davelab6]] ([[User talk:Davelab6|talk]])

Revision as of 00:12, 20 April 2016 view source Quozl (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 1,290 edits →GNU General Public License only? ← Older edit		Revision as of 08:48, 20 April 2016 view source Davelab6 (talk \| contribs) Administrators 534 edits Reply to Quozl Newer edit →
Line 38:		Line 38:

	:::: Yes, because [[Sugar_Labs/FAQ#What_are_the_principles_that_guide_Sugar_Labs.3F\|individual activities may be under different licenses]], which could be GPL incompatible. Also, [http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/pages/developer_faq#license activities.sugarlabs.org] supports other license types. Seems vague overall. It doesn't seem to be clear if a learner can use a GPL incompatible license for an activity they write and share with their friends. My opinion is that a learner should be free to use an incompatible license. COPYING file in sugar-toolkit-gtk3 does say GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), which permits linking from a body of work that is incompatibly licensed. --[[User:Quozl\|Quozl]] ([[User talk:Quozl\|talk]]) 01:12, 20 April 2016 (EDT)		:::: Yes, because [[Sugar_Labs/FAQ#What_are_the_principles_that_guide_Sugar_Labs.3F\|individual activities may be under different licenses]], which could be GPL incompatible. Also, [http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/pages/developer_faq#license activities.sugarlabs.org] supports other license types. Seems vague overall. It doesn't seem to be clear if a learner can use a GPL incompatible license for an activity they write and share with their friends. My opinion is that a learner should be free to use an incompatible license. COPYING file in sugar-toolkit-gtk3 does say GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), which permits linking from a body of work that is incompatibly licensed. --[[User:Quozl\|Quozl]] ([[User talk:Quozl\|talk]]) 01:12, 20 April 2016 (EDT)

			::::: I'll raise the topic on IAEP :) [[User:Davelab6\|Davelab6]] ([[User talk:Davelab6\|talk]])