1,286
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 36:
Line 36: + +
→GNU General Public License only?
::: No, my understanding is that Sugar is GPL and requires Activities to be GPL compatible. Am I incorrect? :) [[User:Davelab6|Davelab6]] ([[User talk:Davelab6|talk]])
::: No, my understanding is that Sugar is GPL and requires Activities to be GPL compatible. Am I incorrect? :) [[User:Davelab6|Davelab6]] ([[User talk:Davelab6|talk]])
:::: Yes, because [[Sugar_Labs/FAQ#What_are_the_principles_that_guide_Sugar_Labs.3F|individual activities may be under different licenses]], which could be GPL incompatible. Also, [http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/pages/developer_faq#license activities.sugarlabs.org] supports other license types. Seems vague overall. It doesn't seem to be clear if a learner can use a GPL incompatible license for an activity they write and share with their friends. My opinion is that a learner should be free to use an incompatible license. COPYING file in sugar-toolkit-gtk3 does say GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), which permits linking from a body of work that is incompatibly licensed. --[[User:Quozl|Quozl]] ([[User talk:Quozl|talk]]) 01:12, 20 April 2016 (EDT)