Talk:Oversight Board/2017-2019-candidates: Difference between revisions
Laura Vargas (talk | contribs) Corrected author of comment |
Laura Vargas (talk | contribs) changed "we" for "I" for accuracy |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I don't follow the logic--seems arbitrary. I didn't agree with purging the members list either. But I defer to the committee. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] ([[User talk:Walter|talk]]) 20:26, 31 August 2017 (EDT) | :I don't follow the logic--seems arbitrary. I didn't agree with purging the members list either. But I defer to the committee. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] ([[User talk:Walter|talk]]) 20:26, 31 August 2017 (EDT) | ||
I strongly suggest candidates to optimize space given and avoid irrelevant information such as quoting other people's toughs different from those toughs of the candidate him/her self. Instead | I strongly suggest candidates to optimize space given and avoid irrelevant information such as quoting other people's toughs different from those toughs of the candidate him/her self. Instead I suggest candidates to focus on a simple message to share your motivation, vision and/or management skills that make you an ideal candidate for the Sugar Labs Oversight Board. | ||
[[User:Laura Vargas|Laura Vargas]] ([[User talk:Laura Vargas|talk]]) 20:06, 31 August 2017 (EDT) | [[User:Laura Vargas|Laura Vargas]] ([[User talk:Laura Vargas|talk]]) 20:06, 31 August 2017 (EDT) | ||
:Another "properly presented" requirement? --[[User:Walter|Walter]] ([[User talk:Walter|talk]]) 20:26, 31 August 2017 (EDT) | :Another "properly presented" requirement? --[[User:Walter|Walter]] ([[User talk:Walter|talk]]) 20:26, 31 August 2017 (EDT) | ||