Oversight Board/2018-2020-candidates/Rahul Bothra: Difference between revisions

Line 7:

* A lot of the members are inactive. They don't attend the SLOB meetings or reply to motions, crippling our progress.

* There is a lot of talk, but there is not an equivalent amount of work done. We fail to properly materialise discussions

* We don't have a concrete plan of our goals. We try to cover a lot of breath in our efforts, ~~but fail~~ to ~~reach the right depth~~

* We don't have a concrete plan of our goals. We try to cover a lot of breath in our efforts, and end up working on things which are not related to our goals (eg: Sugar Social)

* We drag work for a lot of time, (eg: ASLO v3) a direct result of inactive mentoring and checks during GSoC

I also feel there is a lack of concern about the number of developers working on Sugar and the activities. We are failing in attracting new consistent developers despite being a popular GSoC and GCI organisation.

Line 14:

Line 15:

* Attend every SLOB meeting regularly

* Revamping how we conduct GCI and GSoC to attract more contributions; prioritising tasks which are more important to us, and improving mentoring checks to ensure that mentors are active

* Work on a roadmap of our goals across various domains and timelines

* Work on a roadmap of our goals across various domains and timelines, and try to make sure they are implemented

I would like support from the community for my candidature for the post as a SLOB member.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 * A lot of the members are inactive. They don't attend the SLOB meetings or reply to motions, crippling our progress.
 * There is a lot of talk, but there is not an equivalent amount of work done. We fail to properly materialise discussions
-* We don't have a concrete plan of our goals. We try to cover a lot of breath in our efforts, but fail to reach the right depth
+* We don't have a concrete plan of our goals. We try to cover a lot of breath in our efforts, and end up working on things which are not related to our goals (eg: Sugar Social)
+* We drag work for a lot of time, (eg: ASLO v3) a direct result of inactive mentoring and checks during GSoC
 I also feel there is a lack of concern about the number of developers working on Sugar and the activities. We are failing in attracting new consistent developers despite being a popular GSoC and GCI organisation.
@@ Line 14: / Line 15: @@
 * Attend every SLOB meeting regularly
 * Revamping how we conduct GCI and GSoC to attract more contributions; prioritising tasks which are more important to us, and improving mentoring checks to ensure that mentors are active
-* Work on a roadmap of our goals across various domains and timelines
+* Work on a roadmap of our goals across various domains and timelines, and try to make sure they are implemented
 I would like support from the community for my candidature for the post as a SLOB member.