Oversight Board/Meeting Minutes-2019-04-05: Difference between revisions

Line 97:

Lionel agreed to add his mail address to his GitHub profile.

We did not make a decision.

== Complaints ==

Line 107:

Line 109:

* who we are,

* this is an important issue,

* why people would tell Samson,

* newcomers can think their ideas are wonderful,

* careful replies are seen as condescending,

* hasty replies are seen as rude and brief, yet careful replies are seen as rude and condescending,

* possibility of anonymous suggestion box, risks of further trolling,

* the complaint can be a criticism of the power we have in the meritocracy, (or a failure to engage in the meritocracy),

* possibility of anonymous suggestion box, or survey, but this risks further trolling, and how asking questions about a problem makes a problem larger,

* need to accommodate new and veteran contributors, ... let them make mistakes and learn,

* we are all very pressured time-~~size~~,

* we are all very pressured time-wise, it is so boring to repeat the same advice over and over,

* possibility of a survey,

* how asking questions about a problem makes a problem larger,

* it is so boring to repeat the same advice over and over,

* we might ask our Ombudsman to investigate,

* we have a welcome to Sugar Labs checklist, (lists the skills and achievements to attain),

* private complaints should be public so the community can react,

* use more empathy,

* a perception of non-inclusiveness, caused by using wrong forum, code of conduct,

* the assisting mentor issue; a perception of non-inclusiveness, caused by using wrong forum, a code of conduct issue.

We did not make a decision.

Meeting closed at around 21:20.

Meeting closed at around 21:12.

@@ Line 97: / Line 97: @@
 Lionel agreed to add his mail address to his GitHub profile.
+We did not make a decision.
 == Complaints ==
@@ Line 107: / Line 109: @@
 * who we are,
 * this is an important issue,
+* why people would tell Samson,
 * newcomers can think their ideas are wonderful,
-* careful replies are seen as condescending,
+* hasty replies are seen as rude and brief, yet careful replies are seen as rude and condescending,
-* possibility of anonymous suggestion box, risks of further trolling,
+* the complaint can be a criticism of the power we have in the meritocracy, (or a failure to engage in the meritocracy),
+* possibility of anonymous suggestion box, or survey, but this risks further trolling, and how asking questions about a problem makes a problem larger,
 * need to accommodate new and veteran contributors, ... let them make mistakes and learn,
-* we are all very pressured time-size,
+* we are all very pressured time-wise, it is so boring to repeat the same advice over and over,
-* possibility of a survey,
-* how asking questions about a problem makes a problem larger,
-* it is so boring to repeat the same advice over and over,
 * we might ask our Ombudsman to investigate,
 * we have a welcome to Sugar Labs checklist, (lists the skills and achievements to attain),
 * private complaints should be public so the community can react,
 * use more empathy,
-* a perception of non-inclusiveness, caused by using wrong forum, code of conduct,
+* the assisting mentor issue; a perception of non-inclusiveness, caused by using wrong forum, a code of conduct issue.
+We did not make a decision.
-Meeting closed at around 21:20.
+Meeting closed at around 21:12.