Difference between revisions of "Talk:Running Linux Applications Under Sugar"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:I believe it's due to the automation. Why isn't this process built into the Sugar Control Panel?? [[User:Graham|Graham]] | :I believe it's due to the automation. Why isn't this process built into the Sugar Control Panel?? [[User:Graham|Graham]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The 'sugarize' information should be updated. The information is out of date for 8.2 and refers to an out of date script. By the way scripts were derived from Bernie's I believe. [[User:Tinker|Tinker]] 04:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:57, 1 February 2009
Can someone verify this information?
Updated information to refer to Sugar Coating.
Sugar Coating
Where's the source for the sugarize.so library?
How is this method preferable to already existing and discussed 'sugar coating' methods? Simply automation or other benefits?
Rmyers 18:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- I believe it's due to the automation. Why isn't this process built into the Sugar Control Panel?? Graham
The 'sugarize' information should be updated. The information is out of date for 8.2 and refers to an out of date script. By the way scripts were derived from Bernie's I believe. Tinker 04:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)