Sugar Labs/Current Events: Difference between revisions
typos |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Rather than commenting here, I want to discuss a third, orthogonal topic: creativity. I hosted a visit to Cambridge this week from Diego Uribe, a Chilean researcher who is currently a Fulbright scholar at the International Center for Studies in Creativity in Buffalo, NY. Diego challenged me with two questions: Can we be more deliberate in developing children's creativity skills and how can we use Sugar to better disseminate creativity heuristics? | Rather than commenting here, I want to discuss a third, orthogonal topic: creativity. I hosted a visit to Cambridge this week from Diego Uribe, a Chilean researcher who is currently a Fulbright scholar at the International Center for Studies in Creativity in Buffalo, NY. Diego challenged me with two questions: Can we be more deliberate in developing children's creativity skills and how can we use Sugar to better disseminate creativity heuristics? | ||
Diego is of the | Diego is of the belief that creativity is a skill that can be taught; there has been more than 50 years of research into how to teach this skill; and yet creativity is rarely a deliberate part of mainstream education. | ||
Diego introduced me to Grace Hopper's formula for creativity that I had not previously encountered: The probability of creativity is a function of knowledge, innovation, and experience, modulated by attitude. (Historical footnote: Hopper is the one who coined the term "debugging" when her colleagues found a moth stuck in a relay of the Mark II computer.) In this formulation, attitude is often the weak link. | Diego introduced me to Grace Hopper's formula for creativity that I had not previously encountered: The probability of creativity is a function of knowledge, innovation, and experience, modulated by attitude. (Historical footnote: Hopper is the one who coined the term "debugging" when her colleagues found a moth stuck in a relay of the Mark II computer.) In this formulation, attitude is often the weak link. | ||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
* In what ways might we tell the SCAMPER story? | * In what ways might we tell the SCAMPER story? | ||
And we listed some ways we might | And we listed some ways we might overcome one of our concerns: In what ways might we tell the SCAMPER story? | ||
* Case study: e.g., a SCAMPERized English class; | * Case study: e.g., a SCAMPERized English class; | ||
* Stand on the work of SCAMPERers who have come before us; | * Stand on the work of SCAMPERers who have come before us; | ||