Ubuntu: Difference between revisions

Dfarning (talk | contribs)
m use ppa only for 9.10
Dfarning (talk | contribs)
m fix typos
Line 14: Line 14:
Lucid has Sugar 0.88, 0.86, and 0.84 packages synced from [[Community/Distributions/Debian|Debian]].
Lucid has Sugar 0.88, 0.86, and 0.84 packages synced from [[Community/Distributions/Debian|Debian]].


The current preferred method of running Sugar on the ubuntu is via Ubuntu Sugar Remix which can be downloaded at http://people.sugarlabs.org/dfarning
The current preferred method of running Sugar on Ubuntu is via Ubuntu Sugar Remix which can be downloaded at http://people.sugarlabs.org/dfarning


Packages can also be install via sudo
Packages can also be install via sudo
Line 21: Line 21:
=== Reporting Bugs ===
=== Reporting Bugs ===


Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SugarTeam/Report for information on reoporting bugs.
Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SugarTeam/Report for information on reporting bugs.
 


'''This is likely to be reimplemented as Lucid hits Feature Freeze'''
'''This is likely to be reimplemented as Lucid hits Feature Freeze'''
Line 29: Line 28:
== Sugar on Ubuntu 9.10 (karmic) ==
== Sugar on Ubuntu 9.10 (karmic) ==


The prefered way to run Sugar on karmic is via sugar-* PPA. The purposes to have these PPAs are that for now there is a lack of official sugar packages in ubuntu(hope it will be resolved soon by porting Debian packages) and give users a chance to test last development releases.
The prefered way to run Sugar on karmic is via sugar-* PPA. The purposes to have these PPAs are that for now there is a lack of official sugar packages in ubuntu(hope it will be resolved soon by porting Debian packages) and give users a chance to test last development releases.


Its possible because these PPAs are based on packages generated by [[Deployment_Team/jhconvert|jhconvert]], its not a problem to support them. These packages are pretty simple and straightforward and were generated with one idea in mind - start sugar, so they don't follow any Debian/Ubuntu policies and aren't intended to be official packages.
Its possible because these PPAs are based on packages generated by [[Deployment_Team/jhconvert|jhconvert]], its not a problem to support them. These packages are pretty simple and straightforward and were generated with one idea in mind - start sugar, so they don't follow any Debian/Ubuntu policies and aren't intended to be official packages.