Difference between revisions of "Activity Library/Wish list"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>[[Category:Wishlist]]</noinclude>
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Wish list]]</noinclude>
  
 
Enter here features or enhancements you would like in the Sugar Activity Library.<br>To track implementation progress, go to [[Platform_Team/Activity_Library|developers corner]].  
 
Enter here features or enhancements you would like in the Sugar Activity Library.<br>To track implementation progress, go to [[Platform_Team/Activity_Library|developers corner]].  

Revision as of 22:12, 20 February 2011


Enter here features or enhancements you would like in the Sugar Activity Library.
To track implementation progress, go to developers corner.

Activity Collection comments

  • Just like Activity comments

Nicknaming it SAL instead of ASLO

  • And personify SAL, the librarian, as a new century librarian of Sugar Activities.
    This would be friendlier to children and teachers, and further distinguish our library from the Mozilla origins.
    What about naming it simply: Library, Sugar Library, i.e., without any acronyms at all. alsroot 21:55, 18 February 2011 (EST)
    There are befriending and marketing advantages to a nice nickname. Developers will use shorthand regardless, and sal is shorter and easier to pronounce than aslo. As children advance to developers, they will recognize their friend's name in use by the adults and maybe feel like, wow!, I would like to do that too. There are lots of Salvadors, Sallys, Salvatores, Saleems, etc. who would take note. And we could even spins some legends about the serious activity leader who appropriated the software to build our library, and the Siberian A L who is keeping it working, and the South American and Aotearoan librarians who are working on curation. --FGrose 21:01, 20 February 2011 (EST)