Talk:Licensing: Difference between revisions

Line 5:

All software and content distributed by Sugar Labs, including activity bundles uploaded to http://activities.sugarlabs.org, must be released under a license that conforms to the principles and guidelines referred to above.

You may use any license on the Fedora Project's [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses list of ~~acceptable licenses~~] or the FSF's [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html list of Free Software ~~licenses~~]. If you wish to use a license not on one of these two lists and believe that it fits our guidelines, please contact the [[Oversight Board]].

You may use any license on the Fedora Project's [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses list of Good Licenses] or the FSF's [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html list of Free Software Licenses]. If you wish to use a license not on one of these two lists and believe that it fits our guidelines, please contact the [[Oversight Board]].

----

Line 26:

:The problem with the Fedora link was a typo. Should link directly to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses now. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 09:23, 24 June 2011 (EDT)

:: Maybe just to be explicit, write "Good Licenses" instead of "acceptable licenses"? [[User:Bert|Bert]] 09:54, 24 June 2011 (EDT)

----

::: Yes. I agree... consistency. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 10:02, 24 June 2011 (EDT)

----

+1, having Fedora list of good licences will simplify workflow on ASLO to make it automatic, ie, activities-testing.sugarlabs.org [[Activity_Library/Editors/Policy/Licensing|sees]] to the {{Code|licence}} tag in the {{Code|activitiy.info}} to accept/reject any new upload. [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 09:32, 24 June 2011 (EDT)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 All software and content distributed by Sugar Labs, including activity bundles uploaded to http://activities.sugarlabs.org, must be released under a license that conforms to the principles and guidelines referred to above.
-You may use any license on the Fedora Project's [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses list of acceptable licenses] or the FSF's [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html list of Free Software licenses]. If you wish to use a license not on one of these two lists and believe that it fits our guidelines, please contact the [[Oversight Board]].
+You may use any license on the Fedora Project's [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses list of Good Licenses] or the FSF's [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html list of Free Software Licenses]. If you wish to use a license not on one of these two lists and believe that it fits our guidelines, please contact the [[Oversight Board]].
 ----
@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 :The problem with the Fedora link was a typo. Should link directly to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses now. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 09:23, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
 :: Maybe just to be explicit, write "Good Licenses" instead of "acceptable licenses"? [[User:Bert|Bert]] 09:54, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
-----
+::: Yes. I agree... consistency. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 10:02, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
+----
 +1, having Fedora list of good licences will simplify workflow on ASLO to make it automatic, ie, activities-testing.sugarlabs.org [[Activity_Library/Editors/Policy/Licensing|sees]] to the {{Code|licence}} tag in the {{Code|activitiy.info}} to accept/reject any new upload. [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 09:32, 24 June 2011 (EDT)