Difference between revisions of "Talk:Infrastructure Team/Roadmap"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Also, we should try to use our own list archives rather than relying on external resources. [[User:Bernie|bernie]] 19:09, 1 October 2011 (EDT) | Also, we should try to use our own list archives rather than relying on external resources. [[User:Bernie|bernie]] 19:09, 1 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
: The Mail Archive presents the content more cleanly and shows the discussion thread tree at the bottom, allowing easier access to the extent of followup posts. --[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 20:14, 1 October 2011 (EDT) | : The Mail Archive presents the content more cleanly and shows the discussion thread tree at the bottom, allowing easier access to the extent of followup posts. --[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 20:14, 1 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :: Indeed, I've always wanted this feature in pipermail. I'll investigate better archiver software... | ||
Revision as of 10:25, 2 October 2011
This iframe looks a little weird, couldn't we just copy-paste the whole report? bernie 19:09, 1 October 2011 (EDT)
- That's an option, though it duplicates source.
- You might want to source the roadmap here, and enjoy the advantages of revisions and page history. Then link it to discussion posts and vice versa.
Also, we should try to use our own list archives rather than relying on external resources. bernie 19:09, 1 October 2011 (EDT)
- The Mail Archive presents the content more cleanly and shows the discussion thread tree at the bottom, allowing easier access to the extent of followup posts. --FGrose 20:14, 1 October 2011 (EDT)
- Indeed, I've always wanted this feature in pipermail. I'll investigate better archiver software...