Features/Inquiry learning global chat: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Current status== | ==Current status== | ||
==A Work In Progress== | |||
*Targeted release: 0.98 | *Targeted release: 0.98 | ||
*Last updated: 02/ | *Last updated: 02/27/12 | ||
*Percentage of completion: | *Percentage of completion: | ||
| Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
===Description:=== | ===Description:=== | ||
This idea goes back to some of the original visions for chat that looked to have it available/activated within all activities. | |||
The idea and purpose to have this functionality is to build in capabilities that help support constructivist principles. Opening up this avenue would allow for Teacher and Peer Questioning within activities. The chat log would act as a writing journal to reflect and capture the inquiry process in real time and serves as a powerful tool for learners and teachers alike. | |||
==Benefit to Sugar== | ==Benefit to Sugar== | ||
*Supporting Constructionism/Constructivism | *Supporting Constructionism/Constructivism* | ||
*Supports Inquiry Learning* | |||
*Supports Peer Questioning* | |||
*Supports Teacher Questioning* | |||
*Supports Collaborative Project Based Learning* | |||
*Supports and Acts as Key Assessment Tool* | |||
==A Case For Peer Review== | |||
Why peer review is so important: | Why peer review is so important: | ||