Testing/Reports/Sweets on Raspberry pi armhf raspbian: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 xulrunner-1.9.2
+'''Review progress'''
+So I believe I can fulfill all the dependencies of the four <sweets> options, sdk: 0.88, 0.94, and dextrose: 0.88, 0.94, so far as is revealed by:
+ sweets status --deps <those four sweets>
+. This error message keeps appearing:
+ ls: cannot access /usr/lib*/xulrunner-1.*: No such file or directory
+''- is xulrunner fundamental to the task?''
+These are the remaining problem dependencies for -S option.
+. error status "dr" sdk/pyabiword (0.8.0-11).
+Aptitude shows python-abiword 0.8.0-11 installed.
+. error status "dr" sdk/hulahop (0.8.2-7)
+E: Package 'python-hulahop' has no installation candidate
+Package: python-hulahop (0.8.1-1) is shown in Debian package search as unavailable in armhf
+. error status "dr" sdk/pyxpcom (1.9.2-15) (<2)
+Package: python-xpcom (1:9.0~hg20111212-2 and others)
+Aptitude shows python-xpcom 1:9.0~hg20111212 ''but it is out of specified range.''
+https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Building_PyXPCOM ''refers''
+. error status "er" http://sweets.sugarlabs.org/sdk/xulrunner (>=1.9.2, <1.9.3)
+Package, squeeze: xulrunner-1.9.1 (1.9.1.16-16) [security]
+Package, sid: xulrunner-1.9.1 (1.9.1.19-2 and others)
+Package, wheezy, xulrunner-10.0 ''Is available, armhf: testing in progress''.
+''All are out of specified range.''
+https://developer.mozilla.org/en/XULRunner_1.9.2_Release_Notes ''Refers, attempted and failed to install, (i686 source)''
 '''As a known issue''' (for Debian), suggested dependencies, i.e., -S sweets command argument, don't work for now. The reason why the -S option does not work in Debian is probably fundamental to making the above process more easy to complete.