Difference between revisions of "Oversight Board/Minutes"
(→Topic) |
(→Topics) |
||
Line 190: | Line 190: | ||
* Funding opportunities | * Funding opportunities | ||
* Sugar Labs logo | * Sugar Labs logo | ||
+ | * trademarks | ||
* PR | * PR | ||
Revision as of 07:34, 19 September 2008
About
When and where
- to be determined (probably on the order of 1–2 times per month
- Friday
- 17.00 (UTC)
- irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:
date -d '[current date] [time] UTC' date -d '2008-06-03 17:00 UTC'
Who
The meeting is mainly targeted to Sugar Oversight Board, but everyone interested is welcome to join. It's primary purpose is to discuss general issues related to Sugar and the Sugar community; however, it is not intended as a replacement for the weekly developer meetings.
How to add topics
You can add the topics that you want to discuss during the week to the topics section for the meeting. They will be collected during the week and send out in the meeting announcement on _____. A reminder to add topics will be sent out _____.
Meetings
Monday June 30 2008 - 17.00 (UTC)
Logs
Sugar_Labs/Meeting_Minutes-30-06-2008
Attending
Attending in person: Marco Pesenti Gritti, Paul Noja, Tomeu Vizoso, Walter Bender, Carlo Falciola, Franco Lodato, Luca Ferrari, Karen Sandler
Participating by IRC (See log): bernie, mostro, mk8, BryanWB, arjs, shenki, jg, cjb, reed, dwmw2, mtd, walter, marcopg
Friday July 18 2008 - 17.00 (UTC)
Logs
Sugar Labs/OversightBoard/Log-2008-07-18
Attending
marcopg, walter, erikos, cjb, cjl, dfarning, tomeu, bemasc, erikg
Topics
Topic
Sugar Labs status
- SF Conservancy SFC-SugarLabs Agreement
- We await feedback from the SFC and OLPC, but there was consensus that it is an adequate expression of the needs of Sugar Labs.
- There was consensus that we have made sufficient outreach to the community that the initial list is a fair representation of Sugar Labs; we look forward to having the Membership Committee take it from here.
- There was consensus that Walter would put together a strawman election process based upon the Selectricity tool. We are targeting an August election.
- There was consensus that we begin with just Oversight and Members committees.
- Image
- We agreed for the need to solicit more feedback in the wiki for the design direction being proposed by Luca.
- Budget/Funding
- Trademarks
- We agreed that further discussions with the SFLA about the merits of trademark protection is needed.
- Conferences
- Linux [1]
- Conferences
- We agreed on the desirability of Sugar Labs participation at conferences around the world, but hope to meet the need by utilizing locals to whatever extent possible. We also discussed the desirability to have a meeting of Sugar Labs developers a couple of times per year. We discussed the possibility of an on-line meeting that leverages resources above and beyond IRC.
- Education [2]
- We agreed on the necessity of Sugar Labs participation in the learning community, but don't yet have a good handle on the best and most efficient means of accomplishing this.
- Infrastructure
- We briefly reviewed the current situation and will solicit a report from the ad hoc infrastructure committee for next week's continuation of the discussion.
- Staff
- We adjourned after agreeing to reconvene on the 25 July.
Friday 1 August 2008 - 14.00 (UTC)
Logs
Sugar Labs/OversightBoard/Minutes/Log-2008-08-01
Attending
walter, marcopg, bemasc, cjb, erikos, mtd, unmadindu, dirakx
Topics
Topic
Administrative
- Review minutes from last meeting
- Approved the minutes from the 18 July 2008 meeting
- Walter reported on some outstanding business from the last meeting:
- infrastructure status: Solarsail is running and services are being migrated over; Walter is trying to find a second server for additional services;
- conservancy status: Karen will provide feedback regarding the agreement the week of 4 August;
- board election: Walter confirmed that http://selectricity.org will be adequate for our needs.
- Set next meeting date
- Early September
- Set date for election
- Solicit candidates for election
- We discussed the election in more detail and agreed to hold an open nomination period until 16 August 2008 and an election from 17 August to 30 August 2008. Walter agreed to announce this to the Sugar Labs initial members list.
Topic
Infrastructure status
- Hardware
- Hosting
- etc.
- Much of the remainder of the meeting was in regard to the relationship between the engineering needs of OLPC and the long-term goals and the relationship to the learning community:
- we applauded the efforts to reach out to the Fedora, Debian, and Ubuntu communities and agreed that supporting these efforts will be instrumental in our ability to reach a broader user community;
- we acknowledged the efforts to date and agreed there is a need for more focus on tools for "trying" Sugar, e.g., LiveCD, LiveUSB, etc.;
- we bemoaned the fact that it has been difficult to find additional engineering resources for Sugar—a priority;
- we discussed some of the subsystems that are in need of attention: collaboration and datastore and agreed, in the case of the latter, to reach out to the GNOME community for help.
Topic
Key issues
- Engineering
- Stability
- QA
- Updates
- growing the community of contributors
- Learning
- Outreach
- Feedback
- growing the community of contributors
Friday 5 September 2008 - 14.00 (UTC)
Logs
Sugar Labs/OversightBoard/Minutes/Log-2008-09-05
Attending
walter, gregdek, marcopg, tomeu, erikos, bernieXO (AKA NerdyNipple-f169), dfarning, cjb, cjl, davidb
Topics
The Oversight Board acknowledged and celebrated the great job Simon has been doing on managing the 0.82 release.
Topic
Administrative
- OB meeting protocols
- We'll appoint someone to take minutes each meeting; We'll announce the meetings on the Sugar and IAEP lists (they are already announced on Sugar Digest and in the wiki). Agendas are set in the wiki.
- Additional OB representatives (learning, design, deployment)
- We agreed that having representation from these areas is important. We'll make explicit invitations to ensure these voices are heard. Walter will follow up.
- Finalize SFC agreement
- Moving ahead, but still waiting for final agreement from SFC for the OB to sign.
- Appoint (Membership)
- Dfarning will organize/liaison with the Membership committee; Gregdek will organize/liaison with the Events committee; Bernie will organize/liaison with the Infrastructure committee; Simon will organize/liaison with the Test committee; Walter will organize/liaison with the Deployment committee
- Appoint Ombudsman
- If Bert is willing, we'd like to make his acting role permanent.
- Proposals
- We discussed a process whereby Sugar Labs vets proposals: a public discussion of the general ideas and an approval by the OB regarding the specifics.
- Fund raising
- Walter will prepare a report for the next meeting about various possibilities. The idea of helping external groups form to share in the development and support burden was seen as a favorable strategy. Raising money for "events" was seen as important.
- Logo
- We discussed a new logo proposal (See sugarlabs) and agreed to have Christian Schmidt take charge of this decision.
Topic
Infrastructure status
- Hardware
- Hosting
- @sugarlabs.org
- We agreed to give members email addresses at sugarlabs.org
- etc.
Topic
Key issues
- Engineering
- Ports
- Stability
- QA
- Updates
- Accessibility
- Walter will follow up with a UT proposal to partner in an accessibility proposal. We need someone to volunteer to champion this effort.
- growing the community of contributors
- Learning
- Outreach
- Feedback
- growing the community of contributors
Friday 19 September 2008 - 14.00 (UTC)
Logs
Sugar Labs/OversightBoard/Minutes/Log-2008-09-19
Attending
Topics
Topic
Administrative
- SFC
- Committee reports
- Funding opportunities
- Sugar Labs logo
- trademarks
- PR
Topic
Infrastructure status
- Hardware
- Hosting
- etc.
Topic
Key issues
- Engineering
- Ports
- Stability
- QA
- Updates
- Accessibility
- growing the community of contributors
- Learning
- Outreach
- Feedback
- growing the community of contributors