Talk:Vision proposal 2016: Difference between revisions

m add missing signature to last comment
Line 31: Line 31:
Aren't some activities public domain or licensed more permissively, e.g. BSD? --[[User:Quozl|Quozl]] ([[User talk:Quozl|talk]]) 21:22, 19 April 2016 (EDT)
Aren't some activities public domain or licensed more permissively, e.g. BSD? --[[User:Quozl|Quozl]] ([[User talk:Quozl|talk]]) 21:22, 19 April 2016 (EDT)


* Sure, that's why its "licenses COMPATIBLE with the GNU GPL" :) [[User:Davelab6|Davelab6]] ([[User talk:Davelab6|talk]])
: Sure, that's why its "licenses COMPATIBLE with the GNU GPL" :) --[[User:Davelab6|Davelab6]] ([[User talk:Davelab6|talk]])
 
:: Oh, I see, you mean compatible in ''that'' direction not ''that'' direction.  :-)  Would a reference to an open source definition be more appropriate?  --[[User:Quozl|Quozl]] ([[User talk:Quozl|talk]]) 22:07, 19 April 2016 (EDT)
Return to "Vision proposal 2016" page.