Talk:Vision proposal 2016: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:07, 19 April 2016 view source Quozl (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 1,290 edits →GNU General Public License only? ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:05, 19 April 2016 view source Davelab6 (talk \| contribs) Administrators 534 edits Reply to Quozl Newer edit →
Line 34:		Line 34:

	:: Oh, I see, you mean compatible in ''that'' direction not ''that'' direction. :-) Would a reference to an open source definition be more appropriate? --[[User:Quozl\|Quozl]] ([[User talk:Quozl\|talk]]) 22:07, 19 April 2016 (EDT)		:: Oh, I see, you mean compatible in ''that'' direction not ''that'' direction. :-) Would a reference to an open source definition be more appropriate? --[[User:Quozl\|Quozl]] ([[User talk:Quozl\|talk]]) 22:07, 19 April 2016 (EDT)

			::: No, my understanding is that Sugar is GPL and requires Activities to be GPL compatible. Am I incorrect? :) [[User:Davelab6\|Davelab6]] ([[User talk:Davelab6\|talk]])