Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical

Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all).

Reasons for removing

• inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
• non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for

other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change

• • code should conform FSF GPL compatible list
  • the rest of content should one of CC licences
• (?) activity is just bundled application which already (well)packaged in various distros
• ...

Reasons for retain in sandbox

• (?) lack of educational value
  arguable, it could be something useful for user environment e.g. UsbCreator
  A: add such value :)
• any confusion with already existed activities
  A: make difference more clear, obvious renaming, making notice in description etc.
• ...