Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical

< Activity Library‎ | Editors‎ | Policy
Revision as of 15:46, 6 February 2011 by FGrose (talk | contribs)

Some points that should be considered during activity review, some activities could be removed at all.

Reasons for removing

  • inappropriate (violent, sexual, subversive) content
  • inappropriate license, see Oversight Board meeting notes for details

Reasons for retaining in the sandbox

  • Any confusion with already-published activities
    A: make difference more clear, obvious renaming, making notice in description, not launching activity, etc.
    • At the same time we should stimulate experiments, changing existing activities and, very importantly, sharing results of these experiments. A new ASLO code base might support having several implementations ("forks" might too hard a word for them) of the same activity. Need to think how this can be achieved.
      alsroot 07:32, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
  • Obvious misuse of categories, e.g., FireFox activity in Teaching tools
    A: Contact the uploader to clarify the categories choice.