Changes

Decision panels/SOAS (view source)

Revision as of 03:52, 30 September 2009

185 bytes added , 03:52, 30 September 2009

m

→‎Process

Line 30: Line 30:

[[category:decision panels]]

−

~~===~~Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases? ~~===~~

+

Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?

−

~~===Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another? ===~~

−

~~===Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution? ===~~

−

~~===~~Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question: "Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution? ~~===~~

+

Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?

+

Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?

+

Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question: "Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?

+

Potential naming conventions:

+

* Sugar4CD/PC/F11 (Sugar, version 4, made for liveCD, runs on PCs, Fedora11 based) - example from Caryl Bigenho <cbigenho@hotmail.com>

Tabitha

71

edits