71
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 30:
Line 30: − ===Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases? ===+ − ===Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another? === − ===Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution? === − ===Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question: "Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution? ===+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Decision panels/SOAS (view source)
Revision as of 03:52, 30 September 2009
, 03:52, 30 September 2009→Process
[[category:decision panels]]
[[category:decision panels]]
<b>Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?</b>
<b>Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another? </b>
<b>Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution? </b>
<b>Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question: "Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution? </b>
<b>Potential naming conventions: </b>
* Sugar4CD/PC/F11 (Sugar, version 4, made for liveCD, runs on PCs, Fedora11 based) - example from Caryl Bigenho <cbigenho@hotmail.com>