Changes

Decision panels/SOAS (view source)

Revision as of 18:13, 7 October 2009

477 bytes added , 18:13, 7 October 2009

reformat voting results as wiki tables

Line 8: Line 8:

{{quote|

−

:"Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following:

+

:"Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following:

−

:* "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"

+

:* "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"

−

:* "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"

+

:* "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"

−

:* "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"

+

:* "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"

−

:* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:"Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?"

+

:* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:"Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?"

}}

Line 29: Line 29:

* Caryl Bigenho

* Daniel Drake

−

* Abhishek Indoria

+

* Abhishek Indoria

Line 74: Line 74: −

Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"

+

Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"

Answer: Yes.

Line 87: Line 87:

{{quote|

−

:"Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following:

+

:"Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following:

−

:* "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"

+

:* "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"

−

:* "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"

+

:* "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"

−

:* "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"

+

:* "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"

−

:* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:"Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?"

+

:* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:"Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?"

}}

Line 107: Line 107:

* Caryl Bigenho

* Daniel Drake

−

* Abhishek Indoria

+

* Abhishek Indoria

Line 133: Line 133: −

Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"

+

Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"

Answer: Yes.

Line 151: Line 151:

=====Question 1=====

−

~~Yes:~~

+

{|

+

|+ Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing

+

Sugar releases?"

+

! Yes

+

! No

+

! Defer

+

! Invalid

+

! Undecided/Abstain

+

|-

+

|

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html Sean Daly]

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html Bill Bogstead]

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]

−

+

|

−

~~No:~~

−

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]

# Tabitha Roder

# Caryl Bigenho

−

~~Undecided:~~

+

|

−

+

|

−

+

|

−

~~Unknown:~~

−

# Sebastian Dziallas

# Luke Faraone

Line 174: Line 178:

# Samuel Klein

# Daniel Drake

+

|}

+

=====Question 2=====

−

+

{|

−

~~Yes~~:

+

|+ Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"

−

+

! For

+

! Against

+

! Defer

+

! Invalid

+

! Undecided/Abstain

+

|-

+

|

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]

# Tabitha Roder

# Caryl Bigenho

−

~~No:~~

+

|

−

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]

−

+

|

−

+

|

−

+

|

−

~~Undecided:~~

−

~~Unknown:~~

# Sebastian Dziallas

# Luke Faraone

Line 201: Line 208:

# Samuel Klein

# Daniel Drake

+

|}

+

=====Question 3=====

−

~~Yes~~:

+

{|

−

+

|+ Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"

+

! For

+

! Against

+

! Defer

+

! Invalid

+

! Undecided/Abstain

+

|-

+

|

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly]

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]

−

# Tabitha Roder

+

# Tabitha Roder

−

+

|

−

~~No:~~

−

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]

# Caryl Bigenho

−

~~Undecided:~~

+

|

+

|

+

|

# Bill Bogstad (dependent on answer to question #1)

−

~~Unknown:~~

# Sebastian Dziallas

# Luke Faraone

Line 226: Line 239:

# Daniel Drake

# Abhishek Indoria

+

|}

+

====Further ideas====

Line 231: Line 246:

=====Potential naming conventions=====

* Sugar4CD/PC/F11 (Sugar, version 4, made for liveCD, runs on PCs, Fedora11 based) - example from Caryl Bigenho <cbigenho@hotmail.com>

−

* There has been much talk of whether we should name with different foods and animals. Types of sugar (sucrose, glucose) has been suggested due to its link to sustainability of life.

+

* There has been much talk of whether we should name with different foods and animals. Types of sugar (sucrose, glucose) has been suggested due to its link to sustainability of life.

There still seems to be much sense in keeping it simple with SoaS keeping one name with a version release number and corresponding release name.

* Perhaps including the type of media in the name could be helpful, but with "sugar" themes. For example SD versions could be "Sugar Cookies," Live CD versions could be "Sugar Pies." That would make the above example "SugarPie4/PC/F11"(also from Caryl Bigenho)

MartinDengler

243

edits