Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | :'''<mchua>''' Hey, SeanDaly! I tried to make your email into discussion questions, posted http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Discussion_points (under the third bullet point) | + | :'''<mchua>''' Hey, SeanDaly! I tried to make your email into discussion questions, posted http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2010/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Discussion_points (under the third bullet point) |
| :'''<SeanDaly>''' Hi mchua! yes, I read that earlier - very very helpful... it's not as "simple" a topic as it seems | | :'''<SeanDaly>''' Hi mchua! yes, I read that earlier - very very helpful... it's not as "simple" a topic as it seems |
| :'''<mchua>''' Do those look ok? I think the main thing is that I'm not used to having discussions like this, so it's taking a while to figure out how to respond to your example. | | :'''<mchua>''' Do those look ok? I think the main thing is that I'm not used to having discussions like this, so it's taking a while to figure out how to respond to your example. |
Line 20: |
Line 20: |
| :'''<walterbender>''' OK. Let's jump in. Mel did a great job of preparing background materials for all of our discussion topics | | :'''<walterbender>''' OK. Let's jump in. Mel did a great job of preparing background materials for all of our discussion topics |
| :'''<SeanDaly>''' yes | | :'''<SeanDaly>''' yes |
− | :'''<cjb>''' http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22 | + | :'''<cjb>''' http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2010/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22 |
| :'''<walterbender>''' #topic finances | | :'''<walterbender>''' #topic finances |
| I have promised a review of our finances. I have been climbing a learning curve since taking over as interim finance officer | | I have promised a review of our finances. I have been climbing a learning curve since taking over as interim finance officer |
− | :'''<mchua>''' #link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Finances | + | :'''<mchua>''' #link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2010/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Finances |
| :'''<walterbender>''' I keep pestering the SFC with questions and I am beginning to understand what is going on. | | :'''<walterbender>''' I keep pestering the SFC with questions and I am beginning to understand what is going on. |
| The trick is to use a mono-spaced font when reading the financial reports :) | | The trick is to use a mono-spaced font when reading the financial reports :) |
Line 71: |
Line 71: |
| :'''<cjb>''' we keep skipping infrastructure 'cause Bernie isn't here | | :'''<cjb>''' we keep skipping infrastructure 'cause Bernie isn't here |
| :'''<walterbender>''' CanoeBerry: glad you connected with Tim | | :'''<walterbender>''' CanoeBerry: glad you connected with Tim |
− | :'''<mchua>''' #link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Infrastructure | + | :'''<mchua>''' #link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2010/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Infrastructure |
| :'''<cjb>''' although being in Paraguay is a better excuse than normal :-) | | :'''<cjb>''' although being in Paraguay is a better excuse than normal :-) |
| :'''<walterbender>''' cjb: he has been on line all morning | | :'''<walterbender>''' cjb: he has been on line all morning |
Line 79: |
Line 79: |
| * mchua plays "I am the wiki proxy" | | * mchua plays "I am the wiki proxy" |
| :'''<mchua>''' It's a small budgetary amount, I'd say yes. | | :'''<mchua>''' It's a small budgetary amount, I'd say yes. |
− | #link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Wikipedia_servers | + | #link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2010/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Wikipedia_servers |
| :'''<cjb>''' mchua: well, the background says "if we successfully obtain Wikipedia servers then we don't have to authorize the big one yet" | | :'''<cjb>''' mchua: well, the background says "if we successfully obtain Wikipedia servers then we don't have to authorize the big one yet" |
| :'''<walterbender>''' seems like the Wikipedia "investment" is worth making | | :'''<walterbender>''' seems like the Wikipedia "investment" is worth making |
Line 177: |
Line 177: |
| :'''<mchua>''' TRADEMARK! | | :'''<mchua>''' TRADEMARK! |
| :'''<SeanDaly>''' our favorite | | :'''<SeanDaly>''' our favorite |
− | :'''<mchua>''' #link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Trademark | + | :'''<mchua>''' #link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2010/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Trademark |
| :'''<tomeu>''' dfarning: wow, that will be great, understanding that it brings more sysadmin resources | | :'''<tomeu>''' dfarning: wow, that will be great, understanding that it brings more sysadmin resources |
| :'''<mchua>''' Background sections there for reading/quick-briefing/reference during discussion. | | :'''<mchua>''' Background sections there for reading/quick-briefing/reference during discussion. |
Line 257: |
Line 257: |
| :'''<SeanDaly>''' also I like "sweetened with" more than "sweetened by" ;-) | | :'''<SeanDaly>''' also I like "sweetened with" more than "sweetened by" ;-) |
| :'''<mchua>''' Do we want to take dfarning's case as a special SLOBs decision consideration in the same way we did SoaS? | | :'''<mchua>''' Do we want to take dfarning's case as a special SLOBs decision consideration in the same way we did SoaS? |
− | (for refernence, that's http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-18#Resolve_outstanding_Sugar_on_a_Stick_decision_.28Q3.29) | + | (for refernence, that's http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2009/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-18#Resolve_outstanding_Sugar_on_a_Stick_decision_.28Q3.29) |
| :'''<cjb>''' mchua: I'd be happy to, but only because I think it's incontrovertibly a reasonable use of the mark; i.e. if our trademark policy said no, we would have the wrong trademark policy. | | :'''<cjb>''' mchua: I'd be happy to, but only because I think it's incontrovertibly a reasonable use of the mark; i.e. if our trademark policy said no, we would have the wrong trademark policy. |
| :'''<walterbender>''' SeanDaly: I am still confused: we have an unratified set of guidelines and an application for a decision from the community. How do we proceed? | | :'''<walterbender>''' SeanDaly: I am still confused: we have an unratified set of guidelines and an application for a decision from the community. How do we proceed? |