Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
:'''<mchua>''' Hey, SeanDaly! I tried to make your email into discussion questions, posted http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Discussion_points (under the third bullet point)
+
:'''<mchua>''' Hey, SeanDaly! I tried to make your email into discussion questions, posted http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2010/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Discussion_points (under the third bullet point)
 
:'''<SeanDaly>''' Hi mchua! yes, I read that earlier - very very helpful... it's not as "simple" a topic as it seems
 
:'''<SeanDaly>''' Hi mchua! yes, I read that earlier - very very helpful... it's not as "simple" a topic as it seems
 
:'''<mchua>''' Do those look ok? I think the main thing is that I'm not used to having discussions like this, so it's taking a while to figure out how to respond to your example.
 
:'''<mchua>''' Do those look ok? I think the main thing is that I'm not used to having discussions like this, so it's taking a while to figure out how to respond to your example.
Line 20: Line 20:  
:'''<walterbender>''' OK. Let's jump in. Mel did a great job of preparing background materials for all of our discussion topics
 
:'''<walterbender>''' OK. Let's jump in. Mel did a great job of preparing background materials for all of our discussion topics
 
:'''<SeanDaly>''' yes
 
:'''<SeanDaly>''' yes
:'''<cjb>''' http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22
+
:'''<cjb>''' http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2010/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22
 
:'''<walterbender>''' #topic finances
 
:'''<walterbender>''' #topic finances
 
I have promised a review of our finances. I have been climbing a learning curve since taking over as interim finance officer
 
I have promised a review of our finances. I have been climbing a learning curve since taking over as interim finance officer
:'''<mchua>''' #link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Finances
+
:'''<mchua>''' #link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2010/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Finances
 
:'''<walterbender>''' I keep pestering the SFC with questions and I am beginning to understand what is going on.
 
:'''<walterbender>''' I keep pestering the SFC with questions and I am beginning to understand what is going on.
 
The trick is to use a mono-spaced font when reading the financial reports :)
 
The trick is to use a mono-spaced font when reading the financial reports :)
Line 71: Line 71:  
:'''<cjb>''' we keep skipping infrastructure 'cause Bernie isn't here
 
:'''<cjb>''' we keep skipping infrastructure 'cause Bernie isn't here
 
:'''<walterbender>''' CanoeBerry: glad you connected with Tim
 
:'''<walterbender>''' CanoeBerry: glad you connected with Tim
:'''<mchua>''' #link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Infrastructure
+
:'''<mchua>''' #link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2010/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Infrastructure
 
:'''<cjb>''' although being in Paraguay is a better excuse than normal :-)
 
:'''<cjb>''' although being in Paraguay is a better excuse than normal :-)
 
:'''<walterbender>''' cjb: he has been on line all morning
 
:'''<walterbender>''' cjb: he has been on line all morning
Line 79: Line 79:  
* mchua plays "I am the wiki proxy"
 
* mchua plays "I am the wiki proxy"
 
:'''<mchua>''' It's a small budgetary amount, I'd say yes.
 
:'''<mchua>''' It's a small budgetary amount, I'd say yes.
#link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Wikipedia_servers
+
#link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2010/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Wikipedia_servers
 
:'''<cjb>''' mchua: well, the background says "if we successfully obtain Wikipedia servers then we don't have to authorize the big one yet"
 
:'''<cjb>''' mchua: well, the background says "if we successfully obtain Wikipedia servers then we don't have to authorize the big one yet"
 
:'''<walterbender>''' seems like the Wikipedia "investment" is worth making
 
:'''<walterbender>''' seems like the Wikipedia "investment" is worth making
Line 177: Line 177:  
:'''<mchua>''' TRADEMARK!
 
:'''<mchua>''' TRADEMARK!
 
:'''<SeanDaly>''' our favorite
 
:'''<SeanDaly>''' our favorite
:'''<mchua>''' #link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Trademark
+
:'''<mchua>''' #link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2010/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Trademark
 
:'''<tomeu>''' dfarning: wow, that will be great, understanding that it brings more sysadmin resources
 
:'''<tomeu>''' dfarning: wow, that will be great, understanding that it brings more sysadmin resources
 
:'''<mchua>''' Background sections there for reading/quick-briefing/reference during discussion.
 
:'''<mchua>''' Background sections there for reading/quick-briefing/reference during discussion.
Line 257: Line 257:  
:'''<SeanDaly>''' also I like "sweetened with" more than "sweetened by" ;-)
 
:'''<SeanDaly>''' also I like "sweetened with" more than "sweetened by" ;-)
 
:'''<mchua>''' Do we want to take dfarning's case as a special SLOBs decision consideration in the same way we did SoaS?
 
:'''<mchua>''' Do we want to take dfarning's case as a special SLOBs decision consideration in the same way we did SoaS?
(for refernence, that's http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-18#Resolve_outstanding_Sugar_on_a_Stick_decision_.28Q3.29)
+
(for refernence, that's http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2009/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-18#Resolve_outstanding_Sugar_on_a_Stick_decision_.28Q3.29)
 
:'''<cjb>''' mchua: I'd be happy to, but only because I think it's incontrovertibly a reasonable use of the mark; i.e. if our trademark policy said no, we would have the wrong trademark policy.
 
:'''<cjb>''' mchua: I'd be happy to, but only because I think it's incontrovertibly a reasonable use of the mark; i.e. if our trademark policy said no, we would have the wrong trademark policy.
 
:'''<walterbender>''' SeanDaly: I am still confused: we have an unratified set of guidelines and an application for a decision from the community. How do we proceed?
 
:'''<walterbender>''' SeanDaly: I am still confused: we have an unratified set of guidelines and an application for a decision from the community. How do we proceed?

Navigation menu